News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Saturday September 24th 2022

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

American University Radio | Is Local Better When It Comes To Our Food?


“Conventional food travels an average of 1,250 miles before getting to its final destination. So why does anyone fly in food – sometimes from half a world away – and use up all that fuel when they can get lettuce or goat cheese from the next county over?”

Read the entire article at American University Radio: Is Local Better When It Comes To Our Food?.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Reader Feedback

2 Responses to “American University Radio | Is Local Better When It Comes To Our Food?”

  1. Eric Stonebraker says:

    “We find that although food is transported long distances in general the GHG emissions associated with food are dominated by the production phase,83% of the average U.S.household’s 8.1 t CO2e/yr footprint for food consumption.Transportation as a whole represents only 11% of life-cycle GHG emissions, and final delivery from producer to retail contributes only 4%.”

    Shifting less than one day per week’s worth of calories
    from red meat and dairy products to chicken, fish, eggs, or a vegetable-based diet achieves more GHG reduction than buying all locally sourced food.

    I have also heard that a very large % of total energy consumed comes from the shopper’s drive to and from the grocery store. Given this, I think any food localization efforts should also focus on food transport issues, eating lower on the food chain, and NOT driving to the grocery store…

    Source: (peer-reviewed article)

  2. Mary Young says:

    What this article is alluding to is the Principle of Comparative Advantage.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.