News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Tuesday August 9th 2022

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

Shareable | Architectural Myopia: Designing for Industry, Not People


In the last half-century, the clear result of “architectural myopia” is buildings whose makers have been so concerned with the drama of their appearance that they fail on the most fundamental human criteria. They isolate people; they do not provide enough light; or provide a poor quality of light; they provide a hostile pedestrian environment at their edges; they cause excessive shade; or create winds in what is known as a “canyon effect”; or they trap pollutants in the “sick building syndrome”; they use resources wastefully; etc. Moreover, the buildings themselves are a wasteful use of resources, because they are not likely to be well-loved, cared for, repaired, modified, and re-used over many years. In short, it is not just that people find them ugly, but they represent a fundamentally unsustainable way of building human environments.

Read the entire article at  Shareable: Architectural Myopia: Designing for Industry, Not People.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Shareable | Architectural Myopia: Designing for Industry, Not People”

  1. Fenno Hoffman says:

    Michael Mahaffy is a friend of mine and his article, co-authored by a brilliant mathematician, is a powerful indictment of the architectural profession. Myopia is a problem widely shared. Certainly PLAN Boulder & The Sierra Club have demonstrated blindness to the disastrous environmental consequences of the policies they and the people they support have wrought upon our region. Certainly the planning profession is equally myopic, as are transportation engineers, whose wide roads kill people everyday. Government policies designed to regulate development must also share much of the blame for our suburban sprawling auto-dependancy and the highly segregated human habitats it has created. There is myopia in our highly polarized electorate and in our largely dysfunctional Congress as well. There is myopia in highly specialized “expertise” of every stripe. There is myopia in our internet browsing – the more predictive it gets, the less information we get that challenges our preferences. I’ll stand behind Mahaffy, but only if everyone who reads this attack will also consider their own Myopia and try hard to overcome it. By the way, to be fair, not all architects share this problem. Mahaffy is a leading New Urbanist scholar who has been working with a brilliant set of designers to transform an entire profession. He’s a “game changer.” I hope all Boulder’s special interest groups can take heed and think outside of their own boxes. It’s not easy.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.