News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Saturday March 25th 2023

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

City Council Reviews Proposed Tree Ordinance


At its March 2 meeting, the Boulder City Council began a second reading of Phase One of the proposed “Tree Ordinance.”  City landscape architect Elizabeth Lokocz made the staff presentation on the proposed regulations, providing their background and rationale.

The issue began in 2007 with the demise of a champion horse chestnut tree at 11th and Spruce Streets as a result of construction of condos at the Howe Mortuary site.  Public outcry over the loss of the tree compelled the city to pursue regulations to prevent similar losses in the future.  Under current regulations, trees on public property or in the public right-of-way are well-protected.  Trees on private property, however, are only subject to protection if they are part of a site review landscape plan, and then only guaranteed protection for 5 years.  Trees are encouraged under the City’s Green Points program, but there is nothing to prevent developers, builders or homeowners from removing the trees after earning the points.

Development of tree protection regulations was split into 2 phases, with some groundwork regulations and benchmarks being proposed in Phase One and more stringent regulations left to Phase Two.  Phase Two will take place later in 2010.  The Phase One regulations, comprising 2 ordinances, will require:

  • Arborist certification in the City of Boulder
  • Increased inspection and enforcement of attention to diseased trees
  • Tree inventories for all projects coming under review
  • Landscape plans for site review to include trees adjacent to the property
  • Extension of the landscape guarantee required with landscape plans

Three members of the public spoke at the Public Hearing, including Margery Goldman, the neighbor who lost the horse chestnut tree, all in support of the regulations.  Council members had a number of issues with the specific language of the proposed ordinances, as well as some issues with the intent of the regulations.  Responses were given by both Ms. Lokocz and Kathleen Alexander (City Forester).

Concerns about the potential additional costs to homeowners due to the arborist certification requirements were substantially dispelled by Ms. Lokocz’s and Ms. Alexander’s explanations that most of the tree maintenance companies already have certified arborists and that certified arborists have skills that are needed to properly maintain trees, protecting homeowners and saving costs in the long term.

KC Becker was concerned that it seemed unreasonable to require landowners and developers who have obtained approved landscape plans (and Green Points) as part of their project approvals to maintain their trees beyond the current requirement of 5 years.  She cited the Broadway Brownstones as an example.

There was no vote on the ordinances.  Council decided that there were enough questions about the language of the proposed ordinances that the hearing needed to be continued to some later date, after staff had had a chance to address some of the issues.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)