News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Monday May 16th 2022

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

Growth and Prosperity


from Google Earth

A new study of growth and prosperity in American cities examines long-held beliefs about the benefits of growth.  In Eben Fodor’s article, Relationship between Growth and Prosperity in 100 Largest U.S. Metropolitan Areas, the conventional wisdom that growth brings economic well-being is questioned.  Here’s the money quote:

Most cities in the U.S. have operated on the assumption that growth is inherently beneficial and that more and faster growth will benefit local residents economically. This examination of the 100 largest metro areas, representing 66% of the total U.S. population, shows those that have fared the best have the lowest growth rates. Even metro areas with stable or declining populations tended to fare better than fast-growing areas.

This study compared income levels, unemployment rates, and poverty rates with growth rates for each metro area. In every category, faster-growing metro areas fared worse than slower growing areas. Residents of the 25 slowest-growing metro areas averaged $8,455 more personal income per capita than in the 25 fastest-growing areas. They also had lower unemployment and poverty rates. The nine-year study period captures the effects of the Great Recession, and changes from 2007 to 2009 show that faster-growing metro areas were more severely impacted.

And here is a summary of his findings:

Growth doesn’t bring bad news to everyone, however.  According to Fodor, certain segments of the population do benefit from growth:

Growth clearly provides benefits to some elements of the local population (see Molotch, 1976; Logan, 1988; and Fodor, 2001). Foremost among these are the real estate, financial, and land development businesses. Growth generates demand for more housing and commercial space that these businesses build, sell, and finance. Higher demand increases real estate prices, commissions, and loan fees, and makes the development business more profitable. These business interests represent a wealthy and politically influential constituency in most cities that advocates in favor of increasing local growth. They are organized and represented through their local trade associations: the homebuilders’ association, the realtors’ association, the mortgage bankers’ association, and the local chamber of commerce.

While certain businesses prosper from growth, the balance of the community seems to suffer. The statistics showing that fast-growing areas tend to have lower and declining incomes, indicate that any gains by the businesses that directly benefit from growth are more than offset by losses to the balance of the local population. In other words, a small segment of the local population may benefit from faster growth, but the larger population tends to see their prosperity decline.

Hat tip to Al Bartlett for forwarding this study to the Blue Line.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Growth and Prosperity”

  1. The study never takes into account the concept of supply and demand or perhaps more clearly stated in this context, valuation, greater growth occurs at a lower price point appealing to a lower income person.

    For example: large growth community has 100 new domiciles located on 5x space priced at 5y accommodating income 5z, while the small growth community has 50 new domiciles located on 10x space priced at 10x accommodating 10z income. The concept feeds its self.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.