{"id":6064,"date":"2011-04-11T11:02:40","date_gmt":"2011-04-11T17:02:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/?p=6064"},"modified":"2011-05-07T17:55:33","modified_gmt":"2011-05-07T23:55:33","slug":"what-do-we-want-chautauqua-to-be","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/?p=6064","title":{"rendered":"What Do We Want Chautauqua to Be?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_6065\" style=\"width: 460px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/chautauqua-picnic-shelter.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-6065\" class=\"size-full wp-image-6065\" title=\"chautauqua picnic shelter\" src=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/chautauqua-picnic-shelter.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"450\" height=\"302\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/chautauqua-picnic-shelter.jpg 450w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/chautauqua-picnic-shelter-300x201.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/chautauqua-picnic-shelter-400x268.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-6065\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Picnic Shelter -- site of proposed new building.  From GoColorado.com (http:\/\/tinyurl.com\/3lozs4g)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>As part of an ambitious, ten-year master plan, Chautauqua is proposing a new, 7,400 square foot building in back of the auditorium and an effort to promote more September-May and mid-week conferences and retreats. But critics question whether this proposal will generate more traffic and parking problems and negatively change the character of the venerable and beloved institution.<\/p>\n<p>At a PLAN-Boulder forum on April 8, Susan Connelly, the executive director of the Colorado Chautauqua Association, presented the principal features of Chautauqua\u2019s 2020 Plan, which she estimated would cost $10 million to implement. The most controversial aspect of the plan is the relocation of the picnic shelter from south to north of the auditorium and the construction in its place of a new building to be called Arbor House. It would contain restrooms for auditorium patrons and space for administrative and maintenance operations on the 3,700 square foot first floor, and restrooms, a commercial kitchen and meeting space on the 3,700 square foot second floor. Due to the slope of the site, about half of the first floor would be situated underground. Connelly said that Wolff-Lyon Architects has been engaged to design the new building, and that its appearance would be compatible with the other structures at Chautauqua.<\/p>\n<p>Connelly characterized Chautauqua\u2019s financial future as \u201cstable,\u201d but she also observed that the cost of maintaining and improving the grounds continues to rise. She said that the Association\u2019s annual budget is about $3 million and that about $1 million of that is spent on the grounds. She noted that the Association owns 60 of the 99 cottages at the facility, and that rentals of them drop off substantially from September to May and also during mid-week. She indicated that the meeting space at Arbor House is intended to draw more people to Chautauqua to rent the cottages during the off-season, particularly mid-week of the off-season.<\/p>\n<p>The other major elements of 2020 Plan are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Rehabilitation      of the Primrose building, which currently houses administrative and      maintenance operations, so that it can be used to rent to customers<\/li>\n<li>Burying      overhead utility lines<\/li>\n<li>Storm      water drainage and road improvements<\/li>\n<li>Dining      hall improvements, so that it can be used comfortably year-round, and roof      repair<\/li>\n<li>An      interpretive center<\/li>\n<li>A      comprehensive parking and traffic management plan<\/li>\n<li>A new      sidewalk along the south side of Baseline        Road, a new or improved entry, and a bus and      car pull-out area<\/li>\n<li>Archives      protection, management and greater public access<\/li>\n<li>McClintock      trailhead enhancements<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"attachment_6072\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/212-1-36PHOTO_3cropped.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-6072\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-6072\" title=\"212-1-36PHOTO_3cropped\" src=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/212-1-36PHOTO_3cropped-300x281.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"281\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/212-1-36PHOTO_3cropped-300x281.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/212-1-36PHOTO_3cropped-400x375.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/212-1-36PHOTO_3cropped.jpg 481w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-6072\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">&quot;In the twilight on the Chautauqua&quot; circa 1900 Carnegie Library<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Another panelist at the forum, Allyn Feinberg, remarked that Chautauqua\u2019s design guidelines, which she wrote with extensive public input, \u201cDo not contemplate significant new buildings at Chautauqua.\u201d She also noted that the more historically important a resource is, the more scrutiny should be given to proposals to change it; and she claimed that \u201cChautauqua is recognized as very, very historically significant.\u201d She further commented that the views both into Chautauqua and out from it constitute a critical part of its character and that Arbor House would block views to the east. However, Feinberg contended that the principal issue raised by the 2020 Plan is not the design of Arbor House or its immediate impacts, but \u201cwhat do we want Chautauqua to be.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Another panelist, Francie Anhut, lives near Chautauqua on 12<sup>th<\/sup> Street and has served as a Chautauqua board member and chairwoman. She claimed that Chautauqua has effectively \u201cannexed\u201d the immediate neighborhood during July and August because of the car and bus traffic that it generates and intense demand for parking at times. She said that the neighbors have learned to tolerate these nuisances for two months of each year. But she expressed concern that the conference business intended for Arbor House would extend them throughout the entire year. \u00a0Anhut emphasized her sympathy for Chautauqua\u2019s goal of strengthening and improving itself, but called for \u201cbalance\u201d between Chautauqua\u2019s interests and those of the rest of the community.<\/p>\n<p>The fourth panelist at the forum, Susan Richstone, comprehensive planning manager for the City of Boulder, noted that the city owns the land in Chautauqua, which it rents to the Association for terms of 20 years, and that the Boulder City Council will study the implications of 2020 Plan on April 12 \u00a0She observed that many parts of the plan, including Arbor House, would have to be reviewed and approved by the city\u2019s landmarks, planning and parks boards, as well as open space and mountain parks staff and perhaps their board. But she asserted that the major question to be considered by the City Council on April 12 is whether the city should pause and reflect on whether there is \u201ca shared community vision for the next 40 years for Chautauqua\u201d and if so, what it is.<\/p>\n<p>Richstone declared that \u201ca lot of good work has already been done\u201d and that the process of defining \u201ca shared community vision\u201d would not have to \u201cstart fresh.\u201d She said that the city\u2019s planning department has suggested a process lasting about two years and steered by a committee of stakeholders.<\/p>\n<p>One of the Chautauqua cottage owners who spoke after the panelists asserted that he and his fellow owners are worried that Arbor House would attract weddings and parties with rowdy guests who would vomit and urinate on the grounds. This speaker advocated a large, stately short-term residence building, like the former Mohonk House in the Catskill Mountains, north of the auditorium and also a new entrance to Chautauqua east of the current one.<\/p>\n<p>Connelly noted that Boulder\u2019s Chautauqua is the only one in the nation which remains open year round. She also stated that it is one of only 21 National Historic Landmarks in Colorado.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em>The staff memo for Tuesday&#8217;s City Council study session is available on the city&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bouldercolorado.gov\/files\/City%20Council\/Study%20Sessions\/2011\/2011SS\/04122011SS\/ChautStudySessionMemo4-5_final.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">website<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The Colorado Chautauqua Association&#8217;s 2020 Plan is on their <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chautauqua.com\/pdf\/CCA_2020_Plan_FINAL_Sept_2010.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">website<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The Chautauqua Cultural Landscape Assessment document is available <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chautauqua.com\/pdf\/Chautauqua_Landscape_Assessment_2004.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> (20MB).<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>A National Park Service letter regarding the Chautauqua proposals is available <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bouldercolorado.gov\/files\/City%20Council\/Study%20Sessions\/2011\/2011SS\/04122011SS\/ChautNationalParksServiceLtr.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As part of an ambitious, ten-year master plan, Chautauqua is proposing a new, 7,400 square foot building in back of the auditorium and an effort to promote more September-May and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":6072,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,7],"tags":[314,103,51],"class_list":["post-6064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","category-neighborhoods","tag-chautauqua","tag-historic-district","tag-preservation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6064"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6064\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6315,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6064\/revisions\/6315"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}