{"id":553,"date":"2010-03-08T10:26:03","date_gmt":"2010-03-08T16:26:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/?p=553"},"modified":"2010-05-22T13:22:11","modified_gmt":"2010-05-22T19:22:11","slug":"transit-village-plan-moves-forward-with-council-approval","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/?p=553","title":{"rendered":"Transit Village Plan Moves Forward with Council Approval"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-554\" title=\"TVAP Phase1\" src=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"310\" height=\"308\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase1.jpg 310w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase1-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase1-300x298.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase1-50x50.jpg 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 310px) 100vw, 310px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Never heard of the Transit Village?\u00a0 See <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/transit-village-101\/\" target=\"_blank\">Transit Village 101<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>On Tuesday night (March 2, 2010), the Boulder City Council provided direction for initial implementation and funding for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bouldercolorado.gov\/files\/Clerk\/Agendas\/2010\/Mar_2\/3B.pdf\">Transit Village Area Plan<\/a> (TVAP).<\/p>\n<p>David Driskell, Executive Director of Community Planning &amp; Sustainability, presented an overview of plans for the Transit Village that includes two phases of development and a search for a new name.\u00a0 Phase 1 includes 1200 dwelling units and 1000-1600 jobs.\u00a0 The Phase 1 area extends west of the train tracks to 30<sup>th<\/sup> St., and from Valmont Rd. to the North Boulder and Farmers ditch south of Pearl Parkway.\u00a0 Phase 2 anticipates 800 dwelling units and 2600 jobs and includes the area east of the tracks to Foothills Parkway bounded by Valmont to the North and the railroad tracks to the South.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Phase 1 developments include:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the Steelyards<\/li>\n<li>the\u00a0 proposed Junction Place Village apartment development south of Pearl<\/li>\n<li>the RTD site (which may now include housing)<\/li>\n<li>the Depot site at Junction Place (the planned north-south road west of the tracks)<\/li>\n<li>the planned Goose Creek Bridge<\/li>\n<li>a still vacant southeast portion of the Steelyard site<\/li>\n<li>the Sutherlands site<\/li>\n<li>an area west of Sutherlands proposed for 65 townhomes<\/li>\n<li>the City-owned Pollard site slated for mixed use and mixed income housing with about 50% permanently affordable units<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Council has discussed revisiting the uses at the City site and staff recommends revisiting them in a couple of years.\u00a0 The City has received a pre-application for the Sutherlands site that includes a good mix of uses.\u00a0 This site has a challenging connections plan, includes the train platform, and will have mixed use development, possibly with a hotel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>With the approval of Council, the City will now proceed with:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>creation of an Access District (for parking and multimodal corridors)<\/li>\n<li>rezoning for interested properties<\/li>\n<li>Goose Creek bridge design<\/li>\n<li>a request for proposals for the Transit site<\/li>\n<li>application for historic assessment grant for Depot site<\/li>\n<li>review of the connections plan north of Goose Creek to Valmont<\/li>\n<li>revisiting the concept for the City-owned site<\/li>\n<li>review the Phase 2 plan<\/li>\n<li>develop a plan for the area south of the Transit Village to the CU East Campus.\u00a0 (The East Campus is now slated for major expansion in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.colorado.edu\/flagship2030\/downloads\/flagshipsummary.pdf\">CU\u2019s Flagship 2030 Plan<\/a>.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase2.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-555\" title=\"TVAP Phase2\" src=\"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase2.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"306\" height=\"310\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase2.jpg 306w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase2-296x300.jpg 296w, https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/03\/TVAP-Phase2-50x50.jpg 50w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 306px) 100vw, 306px\" \/><\/a>The Transit Village site includes a pocket park near the Depot, an ambitious public art program (42 proposals have been received from artists), an aggressive stormwater plan, and the Access District.\u00a0 On Thursday March 4, Planning Board considered a concept plan for Junction Place Village,<strong> <\/strong>a mixed-use development with 300 apartments and 11,000 square feet of\u00a0non-residential floor area on 5.02 acres<strong> <\/strong>located\u00a0south of\u00a0Pearl Parkway and the future Junction\u00a0Place.<\/p>\n<h2>Tuesday&#8217;s Hearing and Council&#8217;s Deliberations<\/h2>\n<p>One of the more interesting discussions related to renaming the Transit Village.\u00a0 Staff provided a list of alternative names, and asked Council members to vote on their favorites.\u00a0 Suggestions include Boulder Junction, East Boulder Village (EBo), Boulder Commons, Goose Creek (Greens\/Central\/District\/Commons), Goose Creek Junction, Depot Square, Depot Commons, Depot East, Depot Junction, Boulder Junction Ara, Boulder Wye, East and Boulder Ara (EBA).\u00a0 The terms Ara and Wye are historic names (pointed out by resident Kurt Nordback and historian Silvia Pettem) for the original train stop that was established in 1873 on almost exactly the same spot as now occupied by the Boulder Jaycees Depot.<\/p>\n<p>Before the public hearing on the motion, Macon Cowles asked members of the public, particularly property owners, to please address whether they believe the area plan should move forward.\u00a0 He mentioned concerns about connections through and surrounding the site, the changes wrought by the delay of the rail component (to 2017, at the earliest) and CU plans to greatly expand the East Campus, and whether this plan was capable of creating a \u201chip, new urban place.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Five \u00a0property owners\/developers testified, and all but one said they support moving forward with the plan.\u00a0 They cited the time and money investments already put into redevelopment plans, and John Pawlowski called it a \u201cgood idea, good concept, and good vision.\u201d\u00a0 Owners like the flexibility of the plan, and expressed some concern about connections, getting the parking component right, and funding for the required infrastructure.\u00a0 A minority opinion was voiced by Roy Young, a small business owner of a Phase 2 property, who suggested that the connectivity plan means paving, creating more streets, and a car-friendly place rather than a really pedestrian friendly place.\u00a0 Andy Bush and Bob Sutherland were strongly supportive the plan, believing it will create something really exciting and stimulate economic activity in an area of the city that is waning.<\/p>\n<p>Lisa Morzel offered a motion (seconded by Crystal Gray) to direct the interdepartmental staff team to move forward on implementation tasks as described and discussed at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bouldercolorado.gov\/files\/City%20Council\/Study%20Sessions\/2010\/1.12.10_TVAP_Implementation_SS_packet.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">January 2010 Joint Study Session<\/a> and listed in Attachment A of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bouldercolorado.gov\/files\/Clerk\/Agendas\/2010\/Mar_2\/3B.pdf\">staff memo<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In arguing for the motion, Lisa Morzel said, \u201cProperty owners have participated in good faith.\u00a0 Now is the time to let this move forward.\u201d\u00a0 Of the supporters, K.C. Becker, George Karakehian, Ken Wilson, Macon Cowles, and Suzy Ageton expressed some reservations, mainly about the connection plans, but supported it largely because the property owners support it and because it has staging and flexibility that will allow the plan to evolve as it develops.\u00a0 Matt Appelbaum opposed the motion, saying he \u201cdoesn\u2019t see enormous benefit\u201d in a plan that is huge for the City and is the linchpin of east Boulder redevelopment.\u00a0 He fears that approving this now might lock in some developments that will be regretted later, especially if plans for the Pollard site change, and he does not believe this plan is good for market rate affordable housing.<\/p>\n<p>The motion passed 8-1 with Matt Appelbaum opposed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Never heard of the Transit Village?\u00a0 See Transit Village 101. On Tuesday night (March 2, 2010), the Boulder City Council provided direction for initial implementation and funding for the Transit [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":554,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[128,3],"tags":[11,67,25],"class_list":["post-553","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-dot-gov","category-featured","tag-city-council","tag-transit-village","tag-transportation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/553","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=553"}],"version-history":[{"count":37,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/553\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1637,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/553\/revisions\/1637"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/554"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}