{"id":1079,"date":"2010-04-16T18:08:55","date_gmt":"2010-04-17T00:08:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/?p=1079"},"modified":"2010-05-22T14:53:08","modified_gmt":"2010-05-22T20:53:08","slug":"new-poll-how-big-is-too-big","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/?p=1079","title":{"rendered":"Blue Line Poll: How Big is Too Big?"},"content":{"rendered":"

On April 1, the City of Boulder\u2019s Planning Board, in a series of 4-3 votes, set the stage for 4-story buildings on the south side of Canyon adjacent to the city park and a residential neighborhood.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Planning staff simulation (not an actual proposal)<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

City staff <\/a>had recommended changes to zoning and the Downtown Design Guidelines that would have ratcheted down, slightly, the potential intensity of redevelopment in the 5\u00bd block area from 13th<\/sup> to 17th<\/sup> Streets on the south side of Canyon Blvd.\u00a0\"\"<\/a> Unlike the downtown (north) side of Canyon, this area is adjacent to the Goss-Grove neighborhood,\u00a0 the city park and Boulder Creek.\u00a0 It is traversed by the North Boulder Farmers Ditch.\u00a0 The Dushanbe Tea House, the Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art and the Farmers Market are also located in the area under review.<\/p>\n

Background<\/h3>\n

In 1997, the Downtown Alliance<\/a>, a group of 35 representatives of businesses, neighborhoods, city boards and Historic Boulder, prepared a set of recommendations for City Council about the future of Boulder\u2019s downtown.\u00a0 In their report they recommended \u201cone to three story buildings\u201d downtown and that new development be guided by “respect and preservation of the adjacent residential neighborhoods.”<\/p>\n

The Downtown Design Guidelines<\/a>, a 2002 document that is\u00a0 “the direct result of work conducted by the Downtown Alliance” recommended a guideline to, in transitional zones between commercial and residential areas, “In general, construct buildings of three stories or less.”<\/p>\n

In December 2008, Council directed staff to develop an urban design vision for the south side of Canyon that would include updating the Downtown Design Guidelines, revising the Land Use code (a Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan term analogous to zoning), and defining public benefits that would be required in exchange for density bonuses to developers.<\/p>\n

In January 2009, a proposed 28,100-square-foot, four-story, mixed-use building at the site of Robb\u2019s Music (1580 Canyon) was rejected by Council as being too tall for an area near a residential neighborhood.<\/p>\n

Planning Board Hearing<\/h3>\n

The city staff took Council\u2019s direction and put together a proposal that would help guide redevelopment on the south side of Canyon.\u00a0 Among the many recommendations were two key items:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Limit the height of buildings in interface areas (adjacent to the residential neighborhood) to 3 stories.<\/li>\n
  2. Reduce the current floor area ratio (FAR) of 2.7 to 2.0.\u00a0 (For comparison, the 4-story, First National Bank building on the NW corner of Broadway and Canyon, 1155 Canyon, has an FAR of 2.3).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Members of the public spoke both for and against the staff recommendations.\u00a0 Business owners including Jack Stoakes of Liquor Mart and James Travels\u2019 Andy and Don James spoke against the height and FAR reductions.\u00a0 Dylan Williams, an engineer, urged the Planning staff to revisit their analysis of occupancy rates of the luxury condos on Canyon, suggesting that the staff\u2019s methodology significantly overestimated the occupancy.\u00a0\u00a0 Neighbors Forrest Williams, Kate Remley and Elizabeth Allen spoke against blocking the views.\u00a0 Builder Phil Shull and land use attorney Ed Bryne spoke against limiting development potential in the area.<\/p>\n

    The buildings on the north side are kind of universally disliked \u2013 for good reason. Bill Hollicky, Planning Board member<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Much of Planning Board\u2019s deliberations centered on the existing 4-story, 55-foot-tall buildings on the north<\/em> side of Canyon Blvd., with some members arguing that those buildings were a Planning Board mistake and that measures should be put in place to prevent such mistakes in the future.<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/a>

    Planning staff simulation (not an actual proposal)<\/p><\/div>\n

    Arguments put forth for rejecting staff\u2019s recommendations included the assertion that the zoning should be the same on both sides of Canyon as a fundamental planning principle and concerns that limitations would dampen development.<\/p>\n

    The Planning Board rejected the recommendations limiting building sizes, with members Elise Jones, Mary Young and newcomer Tim Plass voting in support of the limits and members Andrew Shoemaker, Willa Johnson, Bill Hollicky and newcomer Danica Powell voting against.<\/p>\n

    How do you <\/strong>feel about 4-story buildings on the south side of Canyon?\u00a0 Let us know by voting in the Blue Line poll in the sidebar.<\/p>\n

    UPDATE:\u00a0 Poll is now closed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    On April 1, the City of Boulder\u2019s Planning Board, in a series of 4-3 votes, set the stage for 4-story buildings on the south side of Canyon adjacent to the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":1083,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[128,3,121,7,88],"tags":[97,100,1052,99,19],"class_list":["post-1079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-dot-gov","category-featured","category-goss-grove","category-neighborhoods","category-poll","tag-density","tag-downtown","tag-goss-grove","tag-height-limits","tag-planning-board"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1079"}],"version-history":[{"count":92,"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1647,"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1079\/revisions\/1647"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1083"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.boulderblueline.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}