News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Wednesday October 16th 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

City of Boulder Ballot Question 2H: Advisory Commissions


By

Note: This article is part of a series of 2018 ballot issue analyses written for the Blue Line by author Richard ValentyYou can find coverage of the other 2018 ballot issues here. Ed.

Question 2H would amend Section 130 of the City Charter to accomplish four things:

  • Allow the newly-formed Housing Advisory Board to expand from its current five members to seven
  • Allow the city to set membership for any new board at five or seven members
  • Change references to “sex” of members to “gender identity”
  • Change the definition of what constitutes a majority to accommodate boards of different sizes

According to the city memo on 2H, Council members brought up the idea of having seven members on the Housing Advisory Board, which touched off a discussion on the membership numbers for other boards. The Council did not decide to propose changes to existing boards or commissions, but did place the point about the option of setting membership at five or seven for newly created boards on the ballot.

Current charter language says commission membership shall not be “all of one sex,” to ensure some diversity, and 2H proposes a change from “sex” to “gender identity” to modernize charter language. While the ballot title includes a phrase saying 2H would “change the criteria for what constitutes a majority,” don’t freak out—Boulder still believes in math. All that this language means is that majorities would be based on the pertinent numbers for voting or establishing quorum—for example, a majority vote of a seven-member commission would require four votes, while a five-member commission would need three.

Question 2H Pros and Cons

Pro

  •  Adding members to the Housing Advisory Board could increase the number of voices and add broader perspective.
  • Council would have the discretion to decide that new boards should have five or seven members.
  • It’s 2018, and time to catch up with the times by using “gender identity” in our guiding document.

 Con

  • Larger board membership might give a Council greater opportunity to appoint more people who are in line with their ideology.
Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.