News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Friday February 24th 2017

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing april fools urban planning bicycles climate action density election 2011 boulder county open space affordable housing agriculture renewables CU local food election 2013 jefferson parkway youth climate change pedestrian development election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats BVSD immigration recreation mountain bikes GMOs transit farming boards and commissions decarbonization plan boulder urban design fracking fires wildlife colorado politics architecture smart regs downtown new era colorado journalism plutonium homeless transit village radioactive waste commuting natural gas ghgs parking rental height limits planning board april fools 2015 historic preservation energy efficiency coal diversity Neighborhoods historic district students walkability North Boulder gardens education land use arts population growth growth election 2010 solar bus University Hill taxes water supply election 2012 water quality RTD library zoning nutrition groundwater bike lane safety affairs of the heart april fools 2016 organic electric utility mayor planning reserve election zero waste politics county commissioners longmont hogan-pancost hazardous waste ballot obama golden right-sizing transportation master plan flood electric vehicle Mapleton solar panels climate smart loan recycling comprehensive plan sprawl PV colorado legislature bears diagonal plaza blue line wetlands epa conservation easement pesticide food congestion street design drought election 2016 boulder junction inequality road diet bus rapid transit renewable energy ken wilson automobile children community cycles daily camera ecocycle Newlands campaign finance sam weaver league of women voters PUC community david miller climate change deniers wind power boulder bob bellemare boulder creek bsec contamination modernism john tayer crime lisa morzel suzanne jones kevin hotaling tim plass Whittier mlk EV green points BVCP technology Orchard Grove arizona civil rights west tsa flood mitigation marijuana public spaces

Ballot issue 302: Raising Barriers to Democracy


By

In this time of disaffection with government and the political process, populist ideas and candidates like Donald Trump are getting traction with promises of making broken things great again with illusory solutions.  Issue 302 fits that mold.

By The original uploader was Serjmooradian at English Wikipedia - Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2929051

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2929051

What exactly is the problem that 302 seeks to fix?  Issue 302 is like the barriers to voting set up in some states, ostensibly established to solve a nonexistent problem of voter fraud, but really intended to deny voters access to the essence of democracy—the right to vote.  Issue 302 would take away our right to vote for the candidates of our choosing while pretending to address purported problems with incumbency.

However, we are not suffering from incumbency stasis.  Election statistics reaching back almost 50 years, as illustrated in Richard Valenty’s June 24th Blue Line article indicate plenty of City Council membership turnover, and fairly high election success rates for first time candidates.

What will 302 accomplish?  Issue 302 is a lifetime and retroactive limit, an extreme and radical level of restriction far beyond Colorado’s own state law.  Like the aforementioned voting barriers, 302 will suppress ethnic and racial diversity on council.  Only rarely are minorities elected to our council.   When we are lucky enough to get a minority council member who is highly valued by voters for the perspective they bring to council and especially valued by our minority communities for the sensitivity they bring to governance, we should be able to keep them on the council as long as they’re willing to stay.  But under 302, that council member would be term limited forever.  That disenfranchises voters who are already politically marginalized.

Another “problem” cited by proponents is the experience incumbents bring gives them unfair advantages in elections.   But consider this: maybe Boulder is the desirable place it is today because of the experience and wisdom of previous City Councils.  Issue 302 will deny voters the right to choose that experience.

We already have term limits.  It’s called VOTING.  Just last year voters turned out an incumbent and replaced him with a first time candidate.  Open Boulder, the organization behind the ballot initiative, seeks to become the self-appointed gatekeeper to our democracy by limiting your candidate choices.

Be pro choice—vote NO on 302!

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
Loading...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.