News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Monday November 19th 2018

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county affordable housing open space election agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 BVSD recreation immigration mountain bikes boards and commissions decarbonization transit urban design GMOs fracking plan boulder farming fires wildlife colorado politics downtown architecture smart regs new era colorado plutonium natural gas journalism homeless planning board transit village parking commuting ghgs radioactive waste land use taxes rental height limits coal historic preservation april fools 2015 walkability historic district diversity energy efficiency Neighborhoods population growth flood students growth North Boulder gardens arts education election 2010 election 2018 solar bus water supply zoning University Hill nutrition RTD bike lane electric utility library safety sprawl groundwater water quality election 2012 affairs of the heart april fools 2016 renewable energy organic flood plain planning reserve mayor zero waste blue line wetlands county commissioners hogan-pancost politics electric vehicle hazardous waste transportation master plan obama longmont ballot right-sizing street design colorado legislature solar panels PV recycling golden comprehensive plan climate smart loan diagonal plaza Mapleton campaign finance bears flood mitigation conservation easement epa food boulder junction congestion pesticide road diet drought election 2016 planning inequality bus rapid transit flooding oil daily camera climate change deniers automobile PUC children ecocycle community cycles BVCP Newlands community league of women voters wind power public health ken wilson david miller sam weaver mlk crime civil rights boulder creek west tsa contamination city attorney al bartlett public spaces green points technology EV Orchard Grove marijuana Whittier arizona

What’s Right about Right-sizing


By

Wouldn’t it be great if there were a simple way for Boulder to:

  • reduce its greenhouse-gas emissions;
  • support local businesses;
  • strengthen social bonds in the community;
  • reduce living costs for the most needy;
  • improve human health;
  • and reduce air and noise pollution?

3-lane north Broadway

We’re in luck: there is. Encouraging biking and walking does all these things, and more. Biking and walking are clean, healthy, and free (or nearly so). People who shop by bike or foot spend more at local businesses than people who shop by car. And people biking or walking have more social interaction, and more positive social interaction, than people driving.

The city’s proposal to right-size portions of four streets (Iris, Folsom, 55th, and 63rd) will encourage biking and walking by calming traffic, providing ample bike lanes, and giving more space between cars and sidewalks.  Though it’s somewhat counter-intuitive, it will do this with little or no delay to cars—because most motor vehicle delay happens at intersections or when vehicles are turning. The proposed right-sizing would leave intersections largely unchanged and would actually make some turning movements more efficient.

All of the street segments in question were designed during the post-war heyday of the automobile, when traffic engineers and city planners made it their first priority to move more cars faster. The unexpected consequences were more pollution, more car crashes, urban sprawl, and—ironically—more traffic congestion. In hindsight we can now see that a still earlier model made for a better, healthier, and stronger city. Before the dominance of the car, it was common to walk to the store, bicycle to a friend’s house, or take a streetcar to work. Street right-sizing is another small step toward restoring that people-centric model.

City Council will be considering the proposed street right-sizing at a special meeting on Monday, June 15 at 6pm.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (19 votes, average: 3.05 out of 5)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “What’s Right about Right-sizing”

  1. Eric Stonebraker says:

    Good stuff, Kurt! Let’s not forget about the safety improvements for motorists. 20-50% reduction in vehicle crashes have been reported from other similar efforts.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.