News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Sunday November 19th 2017

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density affordable housing boulder county open space agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth election pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 BVSD immigration mountain bikes recreation transit urban design GMOs farming decarbonization plan boulder boards and commissions fires fracking wildlife colorado politics downtown architecture new era colorado smart regs plutonium journalism homeless transit village parking commuting radioactive waste ghgs height limits natural gas rental planning board coal energy efficiency walkability historic preservation april fools 2015 population growth land use historic district diversity Neighborhoods flood students North Boulder arts gardens education solar election 2010 growth University Hill bus zoning taxes water supply nutrition RTD library electric utility safety water quality bike lane election 2012 groundwater sprawl april fools 2016 affairs of the heart organic flood plain blue line mayor zero waste planning reserve wetlands hazardous waste politics county commissioners hogan-pancost obama transportation master plan renewable energy electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design golden Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan longmont climate smart loan diagonal plaza bears colorado legislature flood mitigation campaign finance boulder junction conservation easement epa congestion pesticide food inequality drought community cycles election 2016 road diet flooding bus rapid transit children PUC automobile daily camera Newlands league of women voters ecocycle BVCP climate change deniers community sam weaver ken wilson wind power david miller bsec boulder creek contamination crime boulder bob bellemare mlk kevin hotaling john tayer Orchard Grove civil rights green points al bartlett technology EV arizona west tsa public spaces marijuana Whittier

What’s Right about Right-sizing


By

Wouldn’t it be great if there were a simple way for Boulder to:

  • reduce its greenhouse-gas emissions;
  • support local businesses;
  • strengthen social bonds in the community;
  • reduce living costs for the most needy;
  • improve human health;
  • and reduce air and noise pollution?

3-lane north Broadway

We’re in luck: there is. Encouraging biking and walking does all these things, and more. Biking and walking are clean, healthy, and free (or nearly so). People who shop by bike or foot spend more at local businesses than people who shop by car. And people biking or walking have more social interaction, and more positive social interaction, than people driving.

The city’s proposal to right-size portions of four streets (Iris, Folsom, 55th, and 63rd) will encourage biking and walking by calming traffic, providing ample bike lanes, and giving more space between cars and sidewalks.  Though it’s somewhat counter-intuitive, it will do this with little or no delay to cars—because most motor vehicle delay happens at intersections or when vehicles are turning. The proposed right-sizing would leave intersections largely unchanged and would actually make some turning movements more efficient.

All of the street segments in question were designed during the post-war heyday of the automobile, when traffic engineers and city planners made it their first priority to move more cars faster. The unexpected consequences were more pollution, more car crashes, urban sprawl, and—ironically—more traffic congestion. In hindsight we can now see that a still earlier model made for a better, healthier, and stronger city. Before the dominance of the car, it was common to walk to the store, bicycle to a friend’s house, or take a streetcar to work. Street right-sizing is another small step toward restoring that people-centric model.

City Council will be considering the proposed street right-sizing at a special meeting on Monday, June 15 at 6pm.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (19 votes, average: 3.05 out of 5)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “What’s Right about Right-sizing”

  1. Eric Stonebraker says:

    Good stuff, Kurt! Let’s not forget about the safety improvements for motorists. 20-50% reduction in vehicle crashes have been reported from other similar efforts.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.