News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Friday February 24th 2017

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing april fools urban planning bicycles climate action density election 2011 boulder county open space affordable housing agriculture renewables CU local food election 2013 jefferson parkway youth climate change pedestrian development election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats BVSD immigration recreation mountain bikes GMOs transit farming boards and commissions decarbonization plan boulder urban design fracking fires wildlife colorado politics architecture smart regs downtown new era colorado journalism plutonium homeless transit village radioactive waste commuting natural gas ghgs parking rental height limits planning board april fools 2015 historic preservation energy efficiency coal diversity Neighborhoods historic district students walkability North Boulder gardens education land use arts population growth growth election 2010 solar bus University Hill taxes water supply election 2012 water quality RTD library zoning nutrition groundwater bike lane safety affairs of the heart april fools 2016 organic electric utility mayor planning reserve election zero waste politics county commissioners longmont hogan-pancost hazardous waste ballot obama golden right-sizing transportation master plan flood electric vehicle Mapleton solar panels climate smart loan recycling comprehensive plan sprawl PV colorado legislature bears diagonal plaza blue line wetlands epa conservation easement pesticide food congestion street design drought election 2016 boulder junction inequality road diet bus rapid transit renewable energy ken wilson automobile children community cycles daily camera ecocycle Newlands campaign finance sam weaver league of women voters PUC community david miller climate change deniers wind power boulder bob bellemare boulder creek bsec contamination modernism john tayer crime lisa morzel suzanne jones kevin hotaling tim plass Whittier mlk EV green points BVCP technology Orchard Grove arizona civil rights west tsa flood mitigation marijuana public spaces

What’s Right about Right-sizing


By

Wouldn’t it be great if there were a simple way for Boulder to:

  • reduce its greenhouse-gas emissions;
  • support local businesses;
  • strengthen social bonds in the community;
  • reduce living costs for the most needy;
  • improve human health;
  • and reduce air and noise pollution?

3-lane north Broadway

We’re in luck: there is. Encouraging biking and walking does all these things, and more. Biking and walking are clean, healthy, and free (or nearly so). People who shop by bike or foot spend more at local businesses than people who shop by car. And people biking or walking have more social interaction, and more positive social interaction, than people driving.

The city’s proposal to right-size portions of four streets (Iris, Folsom, 55th, and 63rd) will encourage biking and walking by calming traffic, providing ample bike lanes, and giving more space between cars and sidewalks.  Though it’s somewhat counter-intuitive, it will do this with little or no delay to cars—because most motor vehicle delay happens at intersections or when vehicles are turning. The proposed right-sizing would leave intersections largely unchanged and would actually make some turning movements more efficient.

All of the street segments in question were designed during the post-war heyday of the automobile, when traffic engineers and city planners made it their first priority to move more cars faster. The unexpected consequences were more pollution, more car crashes, urban sprawl, and—ironically—more traffic congestion. In hindsight we can now see that a still earlier model made for a better, healthier, and stronger city. Before the dominance of the car, it was common to walk to the store, bicycle to a friend’s house, or take a streetcar to work. Street right-sizing is another small step toward restoring that people-centric model.

City Council will be considering the proposed street right-sizing at a special meeting on Monday, June 15 at 6pm.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (18 votes, average: 3.17 out of 5)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “What’s Right about Right-sizing”

  1. Eric Stonebraker says:

    Good stuff, Kurt! Let’s not forget about the safety improvements for motorists. 20-50% reduction in vehicle crashes have been reported from other similar efforts.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.