News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Monday July 13th 2020

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

Water, Fracking, and a Dry State Quenching Its Thirst


By

If you listen closely, you can hear a collective sigh of relief come across Colorado, as spring rain and snow continue their welcomed deluge on a parched, water-scarce state. Brush-clearers are taking a break from trimming, their fear of summer fires placated, if only momentarily. City officials are beginning to think more about flash floods than smoking forests. Would-be hikers are exclaiming, “Thank god, now we can have campfires!” (tempting fate, to be sure).

The excitement is certainly justified. Mountain snowpack, which accounts for 90% of Colorado’s water, is up by 366% compared with this time last year. Precipitation on the eastern plains is also up; by the second week of the month, the state had already surpassed its April precipitation average. Granted, a whopping two inches isn’t much of a bar to vault, but the news is encouraging nonetheless.

In light of this newfound easing of precipitation poverty, water usage should be given a renewed consideration in connection with hydraulic fracturing along the Front Range. The town of Longmont has already banned fracking, following the passage of Ballot Question 300 in November. Other bans are in the works: the Boulder City Council will vote on June 4th on a five year moratorium and, as Bloomberg reported earlier this month, the state’s General Assembly is voting on substantial regulation overhaul against the oil and gas industry.

While environmentalists are encouraged by municipal and state efforts to contain fracking, the rhetoric and motivations for resisting the industry are misplaced in a state where water is such a scarce resource. Justification for banning fracking most often rests on cries of pollution, unpredictable seismic consequences, and—the most vocal, yet most unconvincing argument—Not In My Backyard. Arguments against the practice that employ sheer arithmetic of available water versus water needed for fracking seem to be secondary at best.

It is too early to tell Colorado’s overall available water levels for 2013, at least in terms of reservoir contents and continuous precipitation (there are those other seven months to go, after all). We do know that the northern counties are doing better so far—but since snowpack is still accumulating in the mountains, runoff hasn’t begun, so reservoir levels can’t be known. But what we do know are the monstrous quantities of water fracking operations employ.

One vertical well needs one million gallons, while a horizontal well needs five times that amount, according to the Colorado Oil and Gas Association. Industry advocates point out that the total amount used by the 43,000 fracking wells in the state is far less than what residential areas use. However, most water from homes is reprocessed and reintroduced to the overall supply, something not possible with most fracking waste. Considering that the given expansion of the Gross Reservoir is equivalent to the amount of water needed for fracking in coming years (18,000 acre-feet per year, according to Western Resource Advocates) water shortage should be the primary complaint resonating from anti-fracking campaigns.

Instead, public outcry—if one follows local campaigns in Ft. Collins, Colorado Springs, Longmont and Boulder—is emphasizing water and air pollution. That is not to say contamination of water tables isn’t a dire concern with such an explosion of fracking in the state (the fourth largest oil and gas producer in the country). But increased water testing and removing exemptions from the Safe Drinking Water Act can only be effective if there is still water unused by fracking itself.

The current round of local fracking bans and city council deliberations has gone forward smoothly relying on NIMBY and pollution arguments. But the oil and gas industry is never fond of complacent repose, and lawsuits to overturn bans have already begun. The Colorado Oil and Gas Association are taking Longmont’s ban to task; similar efforts will surely follow Boulder’s vote (which, knowing the Boulder demographic and their penchant for All Things Green, will pass) as well as the efforts in Ft. Collins and Colorado Springs.

Given that Colorado now has the chance to recover from two straight years of drought, comprehensive, but simple, arguments based on the arithmetic of state water availability need to be the backbone of the next round of resistance to lawsuits, if only for the sake of drinking water, a flash flood here and there, and the warmth of a campfire among friends.

 

(photo by Noah Caldwell)

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.