News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Saturday April 20th 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county open space affordable housing election agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD immigration mountain bikes boards and commissions decarbonization transit urban design GMOs fracking plan boulder farming fires wildlife colorado politics downtown architecture smart regs new era colorado plutonium natural gas journalism homeless planning board transit village parking commuting ghgs radioactive waste land use taxes rental height limits coal historic preservation april fools 2015 walkability historic district diversity energy efficiency Neighborhoods population growth flood students growth North Boulder gardens arts education election 2010 election 2018 solar bus water supply zoning University Hill nutrition RTD bike lane electric utility library safety sprawl groundwater water quality election 2012 affairs of the heart april fools 2016 renewable energy organic flood plain planning reserve mayor zero waste blue line wetlands county commissioners hogan-pancost politics electric vehicle hazardous waste transportation master plan obama longmont ballot right-sizing street design colorado legislature solar panels PV recycling golden comprehensive plan climate smart loan diagonal plaza Mapleton campaign finance bears flood mitigation conservation easement epa food boulder junction congestion pesticide road diet drought election 2016 planning inequality bus rapid transit flooding oil daily camera climate change deniers automobile PUC children ecocycle community cycles BVCP Newlands community league of women voters wind power public health ken wilson david miller sam weaver mlk crime civil rights boulder creek west tsa contamination city attorney al bartlett public spaces green points technology EV Orchard Grove marijuana Whittier arizona

The Atlantic Cities | The Most and Least Affordable Housing in America


By

“The authors specifically call out new construction that is significantly controlled by comprehensive plans or through more restrictive land use regulations “referred to as ‘compact development,’ ‘urban consolidation,’ ‘growth management’ and ‘smart growth.’” The thesis is that these places create housing that is unaffordable. And conversely, the places ranked as affordable – Phoenix, Atlanta, Las Vegas – tend to be areas associated with sprawl development.”

Read the entire article at The Atlantic Cities: The Most and Least Affordable Housing in America.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “The Atlantic Cities | The Most and Least Affordable Housing in America”

  1. Zane Selvans says:

    You can’t meaningfully separate transportation and housing costs. Looking at only the cost of a house in the exurbs, and not the costs of living in sprawl is disingenuous. Sure, the sweet Passivhaus condo in Portland’s Pearl District costs three times as much as a McMansion on the outskirts of Phoenix, but instead of spending 2 hours in a car every day you spend one hour riding around town on the MAX or your bike. That’s time that meaningfully improves your quality of life, while reducing your transportation and healthcare costs. The sprawl lobby will call out “strict regulations” when they incentivize something other than sprawl, but they’re notably silent about all the equally strict regulations that *mandate* sprawl in most of the country. Road engineering guidelines that prohibit dense, permeable street networks. Parking requirements that make it impossible to put anything close to anything else without digging a six story automobile dungeon under every building. Or federal and state transportation funding priorities which are happy to subsidize 16 lane freeways and two billion dollar car tunnels, but somehow can’t find cash for BRT or any kind of human powered transportation infrastructure?

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.