News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Monday September 16th 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

The Atlantic Cities | The Most and Least Affordable Housing in America


By

“The authors specifically call out new construction that is significantly controlled by comprehensive plans or through more restrictive land use regulations “referred to as ‘compact development,’ ‘urban consolidation,’ ‘growth management’ and ‘smart growth.’” The thesis is that these places create housing that is unaffordable. And conversely, the places ranked as affordable – Phoenix, Atlanta, Las Vegas – tend to be areas associated with sprawl development.”

Read the entire article at The Atlantic Cities: The Most and Least Affordable Housing in America.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “The Atlantic Cities | The Most and Least Affordable Housing in America”

  1. Zane Selvans says:

    You can’t meaningfully separate transportation and housing costs. Looking at only the cost of a house in the exurbs, and not the costs of living in sprawl is disingenuous. Sure, the sweet Passivhaus condo in Portland’s Pearl District costs three times as much as a McMansion on the outskirts of Phoenix, but instead of spending 2 hours in a car every day you spend one hour riding around town on the MAX or your bike. That’s time that meaningfully improves your quality of life, while reducing your transportation and healthcare costs. The sprawl lobby will call out “strict regulations” when they incentivize something other than sprawl, but they’re notably silent about all the equally strict regulations that *mandate* sprawl in most of the country. Road engineering guidelines that prohibit dense, permeable street networks. Parking requirements that make it impossible to put anything close to anything else without digging a six story automobile dungeon under every building. Or federal and state transportation funding priorities which are happy to subsidize 16 lane freeways and two billion dollar car tunnels, but somehow can’t find cash for BRT or any kind of human powered transportation infrastructure?

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.