News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Tuesday June 18th 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county open space affordable housing election agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD immigration mountain bikes boards and commissions decarbonization transit urban design GMOs fracking plan boulder farming fires wildlife colorado politics downtown architecture smart regs new era colorado plutonium natural gas journalism homeless planning board transit village parking commuting ghgs radioactive waste land use taxes rental height limits coal historic preservation april fools 2015 walkability historic district diversity energy efficiency Neighborhoods population growth flood students growth North Boulder gardens arts education election 2010 election 2018 solar bus water supply zoning University Hill nutrition RTD bike lane electric utility library safety sprawl groundwater water quality election 2012 affairs of the heart april fools 2016 renewable energy organic flood plain planning reserve mayor zero waste blue line wetlands county commissioners hogan-pancost politics electric vehicle hazardous waste transportation master plan obama longmont ballot right-sizing street design colorado legislature solar panels PV recycling golden comprehensive plan climate smart loan diagonal plaza Mapleton campaign finance bears flood mitigation conservation easement epa food boulder junction congestion pesticide road diet drought election 2016 planning inequality bus rapid transit flooding oil daily camera climate change deniers automobile PUC children ecocycle community cycles BVCP Newlands community league of women voters wind power public health ken wilson david miller sam weaver mlk crime civil rights boulder creek west tsa contamination city attorney al bartlett public spaces green points technology EV Orchard Grove marijuana Whittier arizona

American University Radio | Is Local Better When It Comes To Our Food?


“Conventional food travels an average of 1,250 miles before getting to its final destination. So why does anyone fly in food – sometimes from half a world away – and use up all that fuel when they can get lettuce or goat cheese from the next county over?”

Read the entire article at American University Radio: Is Local Better When It Comes To Our Food?.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Reader Feedback

2 Responses to “American University Radio | Is Local Better When It Comes To Our Food?”

  1. Eric Stonebraker says:

    “We find that although food is transported long distances in general the GHG emissions associated with food are dominated by the production phase,83% of the average U.S.household’s 8.1 t CO2e/yr footprint for food consumption.Transportation as a whole represents only 11% of life-cycle GHG emissions, and final delivery from producer to retail contributes only 4%.”

    Shifting less than one day per week’s worth of calories
    from red meat and dairy products to chicken, fish, eggs, or a vegetable-based diet achieves more GHG reduction than buying all locally sourced food.

    I have also heard that a very large % of total energy consumed comes from the shopper’s drive to and from the grocery store. Given this, I think any food localization efforts should also focus on food transport issues, eating lower on the food chain, and NOT driving to the grocery store…

    Source: (peer-reviewed article)

  2. Mary Young says:

    What this article is alluding to is the Principle of Comparative Advantage.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.