News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Tuesday May 21st 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county open space affordable housing election agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD immigration mountain bikes boards and commissions decarbonization transit urban design GMOs fracking plan boulder farming fires wildlife colorado politics downtown architecture smart regs new era colorado plutonium natural gas journalism homeless planning board transit village parking commuting ghgs radioactive waste land use taxes rental height limits coal historic preservation april fools 2015 walkability historic district diversity energy efficiency Neighborhoods population growth flood students growth North Boulder gardens arts education election 2010 election 2018 solar bus water supply zoning University Hill nutrition RTD bike lane electric utility library safety sprawl groundwater water quality election 2012 affairs of the heart april fools 2016 renewable energy organic flood plain planning reserve mayor zero waste blue line wetlands county commissioners hogan-pancost politics electric vehicle hazardous waste transportation master plan obama longmont ballot right-sizing street design colorado legislature solar panels PV recycling golden comprehensive plan climate smart loan diagonal plaza Mapleton campaign finance bears flood mitigation conservation easement epa food boulder junction congestion pesticide road diet drought election 2016 planning inequality bus rapid transit flooding oil daily camera climate change deniers automobile PUC children ecocycle community cycles BVCP Newlands community league of women voters wind power public health ken wilson david miller sam weaver mlk crime civil rights boulder creek west tsa contamination city attorney al bartlett public spaces green points technology EV Orchard Grove marijuana Whittier arizona

Shareable | Architectural Myopia: Designing for Industry, Not People


By

In the last half-century, the clear result of “architectural myopia” is buildings whose makers have been so concerned with the drama of their appearance that they fail on the most fundamental human criteria. They isolate people; they do not provide enough light; or provide a poor quality of light; they provide a hostile pedestrian environment at their edges; they cause excessive shade; or create winds in what is known as a “canyon effect”; or they trap pollutants in the “sick building syndrome”; they use resources wastefully; etc. Moreover, the buildings themselves are a wasteful use of resources, because they are not likely to be well-loved, cared for, repaired, modified, and re-used over many years. In short, it is not just that people find them ugly, but they represent a fundamentally unsustainable way of building human environments.

Read the entire article at  Shareable: Architectural Myopia: Designing for Industry, Not People.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Shareable | Architectural Myopia: Designing for Industry, Not People”

  1. Fenno Hoffman says:

    Michael Mahaffy is a friend of mine and his article, co-authored by a brilliant mathematician, is a powerful indictment of the architectural profession. Myopia is a problem widely shared. Certainly PLAN Boulder & The Sierra Club have demonstrated blindness to the disastrous environmental consequences of the policies they and the people they support have wrought upon our region. Certainly the planning profession is equally myopic, as are transportation engineers, whose wide roads kill people everyday. Government policies designed to regulate development must also share much of the blame for our suburban sprawling auto-dependancy and the highly segregated human habitats it has created. There is myopia in our highly polarized electorate and in our largely dysfunctional Congress as well. There is myopia in highly specialized “expertise” of every stripe. There is myopia in our internet browsing – the more predictive it gets, the less information we get that challenges our preferences. I’ll stand behind Mahaffy, but only if everyone who reads this attack will also consider their own Myopia and try hard to overcome it. By the way, to be fair, not all architects share this problem. Mahaffy is a leading New Urbanist scholar who has been working with a brilliant set of designers to transform an entire profession. He’s a “game changer.” I hope all Boulder’s special interest groups can take heed and think outside of their own boxes. It’s not easy.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.