News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Thursday November 14th 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

NYTimes.com | The Dutch Way: Bicycles and Fresh Bread


By

While Europe is dealing with congestion and greenhouse gas buildup by turning urban centers into pedestrian zones and finding innovative ways to combine driving with public transportation, many American cities are carving out more parking spaces.

Read the entire article at the NYTimes.com: The Dutch Way: Bicycles and Fresh Bread

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “NYTimes.com | The Dutch Way: Bicycles and Fresh Bread”

  1. Eva Kosinski says:

    A lot does have to do with the culture. We have some very different views on how transportation should be done here in the US. Because we try to centralize it all by government mandate, there are lobbyists at every turn from the car companies, the construction industry, the civil engineers, all of whom have jobs that depend on keeping cars on the roads. And the unions, which have become huge campaign contributors, always try to keep as many jobs as possible in the auto industry. When the choices aren’t quite so scripted, people do what’s logical — not what costs the most in money and in air quality.

    It’s still pretty tough to cart around artwork or give people who are elderly rides to their doctors appointments on bicycles, and sometimes it feels (to those of us who are old farts) that there’s a presumption that everyone’s in good health, and they’re all young and can spend the time it takes to get really good at riding (at least to cover some of the commuting needed around here), and they don’t consider anyone outside the younger set.

    But we’ve got to be a bit careful about assuming the same urban model with pedestrian focus will even work here. We do NOT have the same respect for private property, concern for others, and sense of responsibility that you find in other countries (we’ve all seen some of the worst cycling examples pretty close to home — the catch me if you can, nyah nyah, holier than thou because I ride types who make everyone else on a bicycle look bad). We also value our privacy a good deal more here and whether or not that’s a good thing, it’s there.

    So far, what I’ve seen is the big developers jumping on the smart growth bandwagon, not because it’s the right thing to do, but because they can get tax increment financing from the already well-taxed public, and don’t really have to use their own money. I’d love to see communities get to make their own decisions (by their actions) rather than have all of this dictated by legislation at the federal level (with all the lobbyists in line for their take). I suspect if Boulder got to do things independently, the generally environmentally-friendly culture would come up with such things without subsidies and the iffy cozy relations between corporate types and elected officials.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.