News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Wednesday January 22nd 2020

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

Fasten Your Seatbelts — the Campaign Has Begun!


By

It looks like things are heating up on the local energy front.  While the Boulder City Council ponders whether to put an Xcel franchise on the ballot or instead ask voters for the authority to create a local utility (“municipalization”), interested parties are getting to work.  The Blue Line received tips today informing us of a phone poll asking Boulder residents their views on energy, municipalization, Xcel, RTD, the City of Boulder, the Boulder Chamber of Commerce and PLAN-Boulder County, among others. According to one person polled, this question was asked:

“Electric rates by the city could increasingly burden commercial users and local customers and drive jobs out of the city. Is this a ‘very strong’, ‘somewhat strong’, or ‘very weak’ reason to oppose the city’s municipalization efforts?”

That respondent and one other said that the poll had the feeling of a “‘push poll.”  A few other residents were invited to participate in a focus group, with a $235 payment for participating.

LATE UPDATE:  This author was just called and polled.  I disclosed that I was on a city board, but apparently that didn’t disqualify me.  During the poll, a number of possible reasons to support or oppose an electric utility were offered and I was asked whether they were very strong, somewhat strong, somewhat weak, or very weak.  Here are some examples in addition to the one quoted above:

“By owning the electric utility, Boulder will be free from state regulations and shareholder pressures that govern Xcel Energy, which will encourage more market competition and ultimately lower rates.”

“Xcel Energy generates about 60% of its power from coal so owning the utility and having more renewable energy will mean better rates for Boulder if the cost of coal increases.”

“The cost of repaying the hundreds of millions of dollars to buy the electric utility will be a financial hardship on everyone in the community especially our seniors and low income households.”

Until I was asked the scary question about the elderly and the poor, I was not thinking that it felt like a push poll, though I have read so much about this issue that I can’t judge how it would come across to someone who was just hearing about it for the first time.  If you were one of the people polled or invited to a focus group, please send your reactions to us at info@boulderblueline.org.  We’ll keep everyone posted on the latest developments.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 2.80 out of 5)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Fasten Your Seatbelts — the Campaign Has Begun!”

  1. […] will first appear in the form of ads.  Propaganda.  Campaign messaging.  We’ve already had some push-polling from Xcel (which they deny of course), suggesting that the poor and the elderly might get their […]

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.