News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Monday June 17th 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county open space affordable housing election agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD immigration mountain bikes boards and commissions decarbonization transit urban design GMOs fracking plan boulder farming fires wildlife colorado politics downtown architecture smart regs new era colorado plutonium natural gas journalism homeless planning board transit village parking commuting ghgs radioactive waste land use taxes rental height limits coal historic preservation april fools 2015 walkability historic district diversity energy efficiency Neighborhoods population growth flood students growth North Boulder gardens arts education election 2010 election 2018 solar bus water supply zoning University Hill nutrition RTD bike lane electric utility library safety sprawl groundwater water quality election 2012 affairs of the heart april fools 2016 renewable energy organic flood plain planning reserve mayor zero waste blue line wetlands county commissioners hogan-pancost politics electric vehicle hazardous waste transportation master plan obama longmont ballot right-sizing street design colorado legislature solar panels PV recycling golden comprehensive plan climate smart loan diagonal plaza Mapleton campaign finance bears flood mitigation conservation easement epa food boulder junction congestion pesticide road diet drought election 2016 planning inequality bus rapid transit flooding oil daily camera climate change deniers automobile PUC children ecocycle community cycles BVCP Newlands community league of women voters wind power public health ken wilson david miller sam weaver mlk crime civil rights boulder creek west tsa contamination city attorney al bartlett public spaces green points technology EV Orchard Grove marijuana Whittier arizona

Fasten Your Seatbelts — the Campaign Has Begun!


It looks like things are heating up on the local energy front.  While the Boulder City Council ponders whether to put an Xcel franchise on the ballot or instead ask voters for the authority to create a local utility (“municipalization”), interested parties are getting to work.  The Blue Line received tips today informing us of a phone poll asking Boulder residents their views on energy, municipalization, Xcel, RTD, the City of Boulder, the Boulder Chamber of Commerce and PLAN-Boulder County, among others. According to one person polled, this question was asked:

“Electric rates by the city could increasingly burden commercial users and local customers and drive jobs out of the city. Is this a ‘very strong’, ‘somewhat strong’, or ‘very weak’ reason to oppose the city’s municipalization efforts?”

That respondent and one other said that the poll had the feeling of a “‘push poll.”  A few other residents were invited to participate in a focus group, with a $235 payment for participating.

LATE UPDATE:  This author was just called and polled.  I disclosed that I was on a city board, but apparently that didn’t disqualify me.  During the poll, a number of possible reasons to support or oppose an electric utility were offered and I was asked whether they were very strong, somewhat strong, somewhat weak, or very weak.  Here are some examples in addition to the one quoted above:

“By owning the electric utility, Boulder will be free from state regulations and shareholder pressures that govern Xcel Energy, which will encourage more market competition and ultimately lower rates.”

“Xcel Energy generates about 60% of its power from coal so owning the utility and having more renewable energy will mean better rates for Boulder if the cost of coal increases.”

“The cost of repaying the hundreds of millions of dollars to buy the electric utility will be a financial hardship on everyone in the community especially our seniors and low income households.”

Until I was asked the scary question about the elderly and the poor, I was not thinking that it felt like a push poll, though I have read so much about this issue that I can’t judge how it would come across to someone who was just hearing about it for the first time.  If you were one of the people polled or invited to a focus group, please send your reactions to us at  We’ll keep everyone posted on the latest developments.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 2.80 out of 5)

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Fasten Your Seatbelts — the Campaign Has Begun!”

  1. […] will first appear in the form of ads.  Propaganda.  Campaign messaging.  We’ve already had some push-polling from Xcel (which they deny of course), suggesting that the poor and the elderly might get their […]

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.