News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Friday May 18th 2012

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

energy city council transportation xcel election 2011 municipalization climate action renewables open space housing april fools boulder county jefferson parkway CU density urban planning bicycles youth local food agriculture Rocky Flats BVSD mountain bikes fires recreation colorado politics decarbonization development journalism smart regs immigration preservation new era colorado affordable housing radioactive waste GMOs boards and commissions wildlife transit village planning board plutonium downtown climate change election 2010 farming parking coal homeless fracking architecture education height limits arts gardens rental natural gas plan boulder nutrition transit daily camera planning reserve solar panels climate smart loan University Hill PUC sprawl climate change deniers organic golden colorado legislature hazardous waste water quality david miller Newlands pedestrian library land use election Mapleton taxes population growth water supply campaign finance wetlands Neighborhoods mayor comprehensive plan zero waste ken wilson commuting lisa morzel suzanne jones tim plass pesticide election 2012 recycling students mining hogan-pancost groundwater Whittier arizona Orchard Grove PV bob bellemare historic district contamination bsec diagonal plaza west tsa RTD plastic bags george karakehian wind power heartland institute Leslie Glustrom jane jacobs conservation easement monsanto oil smart grid valmont butte county commissioners food epa police john tayer blue friday city budget marijuana car share ecocycle districting BVCP zoning mobile home parks North Boulder ken regelson Washington van jones bike share bus silly walks snow removal green jobs recession blue line peak oil school lunch civil rights chautauqua dead malls mountain lions watch crime chamber energy efficiency tsunami census Old North Boulder beetle trash green points trails diversity tom tancredo technology historic boulder Martin Acres state budget media bruce city manager bears public spaces

Fasten Your Seatbelts — the Campaign Has Begun!


By

It looks like things are heating up on the local energy front.  While the Boulder City Council ponders whether to put an Xcel franchise on the ballot or instead ask voters for the authority to create a local utility (“municipalization”), interested parties are getting to work.  The Blue Line received tips today informing us of a phone poll asking Boulder residents their views on energy, municipalization, Xcel, RTD, the City of Boulder, the Boulder Chamber of Commerce and PLAN-Boulder County, among others. According to one person polled, this question was asked:

“Electric rates by the city could increasingly burden commercial users and local customers and drive jobs out of the city. Is this a ‘very strong’, ‘somewhat strong’, or ‘very weak’ reason to oppose the city’s municipalization efforts?”

That respondent and one other said that the poll had the feeling of a “‘push poll.”  A few other residents were invited to participate in a focus group, with a $235 payment for participating.

LATE UPDATE:  This author was just called and polled.  I disclosed that I was on a city board, but apparently that didn’t disqualify me.  During the poll, a number of possible reasons to support or oppose an electric utility were offered and I was asked whether they were very strong, somewhat strong, somewhat weak, or very weak.  Here are some examples in addition to the one quoted above:

“By owning the electric utility, Boulder will be free from state regulations and shareholder pressures that govern Xcel Energy, which will encourage more market competition and ultimately lower rates.”

“Xcel Energy generates about 60% of its power from coal so owning the utility and having more renewable energy will mean better rates for Boulder if the cost of coal increases.”

“The cost of repaying the hundreds of millions of dollars to buy the electric utility will be a financial hardship on everyone in the community especially our seniors and low income households.”

Until I was asked the scary question about the elderly and the poor, I was not thinking that it felt like a push poll, though I have read so much about this issue that I can’t judge how it would come across to someone who was just hearing about it for the first time.  If you were one of the people polled or invited to a focus group, please send your reactions to us at info@boulderblueline.org.  We’ll keep everyone posted on the latest developments.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 2.80 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Fasten Your Seatbelts — the Campaign Has Begun!”

  1. [...] will first appear in the form of ads.  Propaganda.  Campaign messaging.  We’ve already had some push-polling from Xcel (which they deny of course), suggesting that the poor and the elderly might get their [...]

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.