News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Sunday January 26th 2020

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

A Big Feat for Those Who Want to Eat in the Street


By

graphic courtesy Max Taffet

Mobile food vendors aren’t quite as controversial as medical marijuana, but as far as fast moving community trends, mobile food vehicles come in a close second. Already, at least one mobile food vendor has thrown in the towel and sworn his mobile kitchen into retirement. Categorized as an emergency issue, three weeks ago Boulder City Council tasked the city planning staff with creating a municipal ordinance for Boulder’s emerging mobile food vendor industry.  Prior to Tuesday, May 17, mobile food vendors and regulators were operating in a lawless grey-zone.

Multiple interests are at play around mobile food vending. Detractors of the mobile food scene have a variety of concerns: brick and mortar food purveyors don’t want the competition; residential zones are concerned about traffic and noise; and city planning staff are concerned about accidental changes to the urban land-use (allowing for semi-permanent pop-up food courts). On the other hand, supporters of mobile food vending see it as a positive community centerpiece in which food can be brought to industrial areas where it is missing; provide a hub for the city’s sub-communities to gather around; and create a myriad of small entrepreneurial activities to add vibrancy to the local economy.

“Hip” cities across the country have welcomed mobile cuisine to their streets already. However, in an official sense these food vendors had never before existed within the City of Boulder’s day to day business landscape. Solidifying several important policies, the city council hopes to ease all parties’ concerns around mobile food vendors.

Features of the new ordinance in commercial districts include:

  • Vendors must be a minimum of 150 feet from existing restaurants;
  • They may only operate on private property;
  • They are not permitted to set up in the public right of way;
  • No amplified music; and
  • Recyclable plates and utensils must be used.

In addition to these ordinances in commercial centers, slightly different rules were designed for other city zoning districts. In industrial districts food trucks will be allowed in the public right of way and there must be a minimum of 200 feet between food trucks. Additionally the Boulder Municipal Airport will be an area vendors will be permitted although it falls outside of being an industrial zone. Mobile food vehicles will not be allowed to operate in residential areas.

For Rayme Rossello, the owner operator of Comida food truck, the ordinance’s passage “is a big relief.” She said that the city and its perception of food trucks have come a long way since she first requested an operator’s license. At first, there was a perception she was preparing to open a “roach coach.” But now, many community members are recognizing food trucks as a gourmet garnish to Boulder’s bourgeoning foodie scene.

The staff-recommended ordinance was passed unanimously on a motion by Matt Applebaum and seconded by Ken Wilson. In a final amendment to the city staff’s proposed ordinance, Councilperson KC Becker proposed a test period allowing for mobile food vendors at North Boulder Park. While this proposal was more controversial, her amendment passed in a 5 to 4 vote.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 4.33 out of 5)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

3 Responses to “A Big Feat for Those Who Want to Eat in the Street”

  1. Seth Brigham says:

    Just little old me with a few suggestions on food trucks in our public parks.

    I think you should hand this off to the Parks and Rec department and think of expanding the idea further than a pilot program at North Boulder Park.

    Just allowing it there will surely set up a fight over who gets access and who does not.

    Furthermore, there are many parks where this would be a great opportunity for food trucks and those recreating.

    What of Eben G Fine Park ? except one must consider parking…

    What of the REZ ?

    And so on and so forth.

    Time for the City Manager to come up with logistics and rules and have the Parks and Rec Board facilitate, or, vice versa.

    I don’t think it is a good idea just to have North Boulder Park as a pilot program as being just the only park.

    You might be setting yourself up for failure and thus destroy more opportunities in the future for both the businesses and the consumer.

    Don’t discriminate, but consider all the parks where this is good for everyone concerned.

  2. Eric Stonebraker says:

    How are these controversial or new? (Well maybe new to Boulder), but they’ve been around in many other cities for a while. Street vendors can only help to get more informal interaction, people on the streets, etc., typically hindered by boulder’s land use patterns.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.