News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Friday August 23rd 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county affordable housing open space election agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD immigration mountain bikes boards and commissions GMOs decarbonization urban design transit fracking plan boulder farming fires wildlife planning board colorado politics architecture downtown smart regs new era colorado land use natural gas plutonium homeless journalism transit village parking commuting ghgs radioactive waste rental taxes height limits coal historic preservation walkability energy efficiency april fools 2015 Neighborhoods zoning population growth diversity historic district flood students growth North Boulder gardens arts education election 2018 solar bus election 2010 University Hill water supply nutrition RTD bike lane electric utility library safety sprawl groundwater water quality election 2012 affairs of the heart april fools 2016 renewable energy organic flood plain planning reserve mayor zero waste blue line wetlands county commissioners hogan-pancost politics electric vehicle hazardous waste transportation master plan obama longmont ballot right-sizing street design golden Mapleton solar panels PV climate smart loan recycling comprehensive plan diagonal plaza bears colorado legislature flood mitigation campaign finance congestion conservation easement food epa boulder junction pesticide drought oil flooding inequality election 2016 road diet planning bus rapid transit commercial development daily camera climate change deniers automobile PUC children ecocycle community cycles BVCP Newlands community league of women voters wind power public health ken wilson david miller sam weaver civil rights mlk west tsa crime public spaces city attorney boulder creek al bartlett marijuana green points technology EV Orchard Grove Whittier arizona

Generation Namby-pamby


By

When did I turn into that crotchety old lady who talks about the good old days when I had to walk uphill both ways, to and from school?  I’d say it was the day before yesterday, when I learned that school had been canceled for my high school student due to anticipated “extreme cold.”  When they canceled school a second day in a row due to sub-zero temperatures, my status was confirmed:  crotchety AND cranky old lady.

In my day (OMG, I can’t believe I just used that phrase), the only thing that closed school was a couple of feet of lake-effect snow dumped overnight – something like the storm that’s hitting the NE US now — a fairly common occurrence at the foothills of the Adirondack Mountains in upstate New York in the mid-60’s.  Cold was measured by the depth of the frost on your windows, the length of the icicles hanging from your eaves, and the frequency with which you had to stop to scrape the ice off of both sides of the windshield on your Volkswagen Beetle.  Neither school nor life was canceled due to cold.  It just would not have been practical given that we had an average of 150 days per year below freezing, and an average low temperature each year in the minus 30 degrees Fahrenheit range.

Source: http://www.weatherbase.com/weather/weather.php3?s=691527&refer

Girls were required to wear skirts to school, which necessitated the addition of huge, itchy, woolen snowpants to ward off frostbitten knees.  The invention of polar fleece was decades away, and four-wheel drive vehicles were only used on farms.

This week in Boulder, our kids were told to stay home due to temperatures that were certainly nowhere near the average lowest recorded temperature for Boulder of minus 28 degrees in February.  While temperatures did dip below zero, it was nothing that a good pair of boots, a warm hat, and some gloves couldn’t handle.  So what gives?

Source: http://www.weatherbase.com/weather/weather.php3?s=51137&refer

My theory is that our reluctance to let our little ones out in the cold is a reflection of our reluctance to let them experience any kind of risk.  We slather them in sunscreen in the summer. They can’t ride around the block without a bike helmet and a GPS. And we certainly wouldn’t let them go sledding on Open Space…there are liabilities to consider, after all.

My fear is that we are raising a generation of namby-pamby kids who are afraid to scrape their knees, afraid to experience the bracing cold on a sunshiny day, afraid to try and fail.  I see it reflected in the way we have stripped competitiveness from the classroom, in the way we talk with our kids about sex and drugs and rock and roll and last but not least…in the decision to cancel school in the face of a little cold.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 4.14 out of 5)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

4 Responses to “Generation Namby-pamby”

  1. Rita Bowman says:

    I am deeply saddened by the oblivious entitlement in Susan Peterson’s piece, “Generation Namby-Pamby.” Susan, do you not know there are plenty of kids in Boulder, many of them in my neighborhood, who do NOT have a “good pair of boots, a warm hat, or some gloves”? What about our kids who have NO boots, hats, or gloves? For Boulder’s poor, closing school was a godsend. If we have namby-pamby kids, maybe they learned it from watching our indifference to the poverty under our own noses.

    Rita Bowman
    Orchard Grove Mobile Home Park #158

    • Liz Payton says:

      I would think that being in school instead of at home would be particularly important for those kids for a couple of reasons: their parents probably need the free child care and the kids need as much catch-up schooling as possible. I wish the school district would trust the parents to make sure their kids were safe. Maybe we need a way to funnel all the lost-and-found winter gear from my kids’ elementary school to Orchard Grove.

    • Susan Peterson says:

      Rita, I appreciate your advocacy for the dis-advantaged kids in our community. Given my own background and the work that I have done to try to help kids, both in Boulder and around the world, your presumtion that my opinion stems from a root of entitlement is patently false.

  2. DanielleMasursky says:

    I find it rather interesting that it’s your generation that now serves as legislators and school board members and school district superintendents who have instituted and enforced these rules. If they are coddling children, or excessively protecting them from risk, it would seem that they took a different lesson from their experiences growing up than you did. I often hear people, including my own husband, grumbling about these same issues, but I tend to think those folks are a vocal minority, because these rules are pervasive, and they were introduced and supported by someone!!

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.