News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Monday September 16th 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action density election 2011 affordable housing boulder county open space election renewables agriculture CU local food climate change election 2013 development youth jefferson parkway pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD mountain bikes immigration boards and commissions plan boulder farming fracking GMOs transit urban design decarbonization planning board fires colorado politics wildlife land use smart regs downtown architecture new era colorado transit village parking homeless journalism plutonium natural gas ghgs commuting radioactive waste rental coal height limits taxes april fools 2015 walkability historic preservation energy efficiency historic district Neighborhoods diversity zoning population growth growth students North Boulder flood arts gardens education University Hill water supply bus election 2010 solar election 2018 nutrition RTD sprawl water quality election 2012 groundwater bike lane electric utility safety library april fools 2016 renewable energy affairs of the heart organic flood plain wetlands planning reserve zero waste mayor blue line electric vehicle ballot right-sizing street design transportation master plan obama hazardous waste county commissioners politics hogan-pancost longmont colorado legislature climate smart loan diagonal plaza campaign finance flood mitigation bears Mapleton solar panels PV recycling comprehensive plan golden conservation easement epa boulder junction pesticide congestion food drought road diet oil bus rapid transit commercial development inequality election 2016 flooding planning daily camera public health community cycles BVCP ecocycle Newlands automobile PUC climate change deniers children david miller ken wilson sam weaver community league of women voters wind power public spaces boulder creek crime mlk civil rights west tsa marijuana technology arizona Orchard Grove EV green points al bartlett Whittier city attorney

Whose Library?


By

photo courtesy COB

The people of Boulder love their library. This should really come as no surprise, since Boulder is a highly literate city with an exceptionally well educated populace. For over a century residents have enjoyed the use of their library. In addition to the Boulder Public Library, locals also take advantage of the Boulder Bookstore, one of the country’s best independent booksellers.

Recently the Boulder Public Library has been the subject of disturbing revelations about management turnover, funding fumbles and reported interference by the City Manager’s office. The situation was mentioned briefly in the Daily Camera but covered much more thoroughly in the Library Journal, the national publication for library professionals.

Even though the library system is highly used and greatly appreciated by the citizenry this support has not been mirrored in city government. Maintenance has been deferred, a long-promised north branch was never built and morale problems have been escalating. Cutbacks in library funding have caused reductions in hours and days of operations, especially at the neighborhood branches. The turnover in staff, especially in senior management, has reached near-crisis proportions.

Much of the problem can be laid directly at the feet of the Boulder City Council. As part of a structural problem in city government the elected council does not sufficiently monitor and guide the appointed City Manager and her staff. When the staff periodically floats trial balloons about further cuts to library services the citizens of Boulder rise up in verbal arms and the City Council runs for cover. The suggested cuts are then removed from the table (for now).

An option now being discussed in the community is the creation of an independent library district, governed by an elected board with dedicated funding from a voter-approved library tax. The creation of the district would help eliminate interference from the city staff, combat indifference from the City Council and allow the library to properly plan for long range services. This approach flies in the face of recent desires stated by some city staff to eliminate all voter-dedicated funds in Boulder (such as those for open space) and put all tax revenues into the general fund, from which the staff can recommend funding for its favorite programs (not necessarily libraries). That might be a popular approach for city staff but not for the public.

Part of the problem with the library, and some other city departments, is a lack of knowledge on the part of some city staff members about Boulder’s history and principles. This arises from a seemingly constant policy of appointing department heads from outside the community. Often these new managers, though professionally proficient and well-meaning, stumble into blunders by making changes that are promptly rejected by the public. They don’t have the requisite local knowledge that makes for good decision making.

In the case of the Boulder Public Library, for example, a director was hired from North Carolina with little experience in managing a system as large as Boulder’s. He became the target for much library staff and public anger when he seemed to support closing the Meadows Branch Library, a trial balloon promptly shot out of the skies by a cowed City Council after the citizenry arose en mass. That director didn’t last long in Boulder and moved to what is hopefully a more conducive environment for his talents in South Carolina.

But the itinerate library director is only one member of a series of senior city staff members recruited to Boulder from places like North Carolina, Ohio, Washington State and Virginia. The failures to promote from within and allow career city employees the opportunity to achieve their personal professional goals locally creates turnover and damages morale. This doesn’t mean the new managers recruited from outside are not good choices, only that looking at the current staff should be the first priority in filling senior management vacancies.

Ultimately the problem comes down to structure. The antiquated city manager form of government is unaccountable and undemocratic. The citizens of Boulder should consider changes to the city charter to reduce the powers of the appointed staff and increase oversight by the elected City Council. The option of electing a mayor by the people, instead of from the City Council,  should also be considered.

Until then, or until Councilors show a greater willingness to properly supervise staff and hold them accountable, budding disasters like the situation at the Boulder Public Library will continue to arise. The people of Boulder deserve better.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Whose Library?”

  1. Seth Brigham says:

    “The people of Boulder deserve better.”

    That seems to ring in my ear in regard to the decisions by City Council and City Management in recent years.

    Why they have undervalued one of our greatest assets, The Boulder Public library system, as shown by it being the first thing to be put on the chopping block and/or neglected during hard times.

    It would help if they dealt with the homeless issue, not by discrimination and alienation, but, with more assistance and an expansion of drop-in services at the Carriage House.

    I was at the most recent Council meeting for 8 + hours.

    Some council members appeared drunk, drunk with self flagulation, “Sifting happens when you are very close to shitting, yet you let out a foul fart, hence “sifting” the fart through a massive shit,” espousing with self-serving speeches about what a great job they’re doing.

    As a hundred or so members of the public had exited, I was the single public speaker for the final 3 agenda items, all self-serving council issues;

    Health Insurance for Council members, pay raises for City Manager and Head Municipal judge, and, rules of procedure/ Decorum rules…

    Instead of wasting the public’s and the city’s time discussing ways they could ban certain speakers from attending Council meetings, perhaps, they should deal with pressing issues that directly affect the public.

    And, not to pass on addressing troubles at the Boulder Public Library by hiring outside consultants from California?

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.