News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Wednesday July 17th 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county open space affordable housing election agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD immigration mountain bikes boards and commissions decarbonization transit urban design GMOs fracking plan boulder farming fires wildlife colorado politics downtown architecture smart regs new era colorado plutonium natural gas journalism homeless planning board transit village parking commuting ghgs radioactive waste land use taxes rental height limits coal historic preservation april fools 2015 walkability historic district diversity energy efficiency Neighborhoods population growth flood students growth North Boulder gardens arts education election 2010 election 2018 solar bus water supply zoning University Hill nutrition RTD bike lane electric utility library safety sprawl groundwater water quality election 2012 affairs of the heart april fools 2016 renewable energy organic flood plain planning reserve mayor zero waste blue line wetlands county commissioners hogan-pancost politics electric vehicle hazardous waste transportation master plan obama longmont ballot right-sizing street design colorado legislature solar panels PV recycling golden comprehensive plan climate smart loan diagonal plaza Mapleton campaign finance bears flood mitigation conservation easement epa food boulder junction congestion pesticide road diet drought election 2016 planning inequality bus rapid transit flooding oil daily camera climate change deniers automobile PUC children ecocycle community cycles BVCP Newlands community league of women voters wind power public health ken wilson david miller sam weaver mlk crime civil rights boulder creek west tsa contamination city attorney al bartlett public spaces green points technology EV Orchard Grove marijuana Whittier arizona

Boulder City Council Asks Staff for a Report on ICE Program


At least five Boulder City Council members agreed to ask Boulder city staff and police to report on the impact of a proposed program of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) on local law enforcement and safety in the community. The ICE program, dubbed “Secure Communities,” was initiated by the Bush Administration in 2008.

The ICE program is controversial, and police departments in cities as diverse as Alexandria, VA, Salt Lake City, San Francisco and Washington, DC have expressed serious reservations about the program’s impact in their communities. A New York Times editorial of August 17 called on the Obama administration to jettison the program, or substantially reform it.

Colorado’s immigration law is already one of the toughest in the nation, requiring local police to send ICE the fingerprints of anyone about whom there is a reasonable suspicion that they are in the country illegally.

The Council discussion about the ICE program at Tuesday’s meeting consumed a small portion of the Council’s attention, and came after extensive discussion of the main issues for consideration: mainly, the City’s revised snow and ice enforcement program and the Clean Energy Future program.

The Council was reluctant to get into a debate about immigration. The timing of the report requested of the staff coincides with the Council’s normally scheduled consideration of the annual legislative agenda that will be subject of a study session on November 9. The legislative agenda contains the City’s priorities for state and federal laws that have an important impact on the City, including a wide range of topics from funding for transportation, education, human services and the federal labs to land use and tax policy.

The opening sentence of Camera reporter Heath Urie’s article on the issue proclaims that the City “will take a stand on a controversial federal program that uses fingerprints to identify illegal immigrants.” In fact, the Council expressed reluctance about wading into this area, but felt that more information from local law enforcement was needed about the ICE program.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 1.00 out of 5)

Reader Feedback

One Response to “Boulder City Council Asks Staff for a Report on ICE Program”

  1. Seth Brigham says:

    Dear City Council and Macon,

    Please do take a “stand,” even if you might have little influence with the State and Federal government, on this issue.

    As well, council should “take a stand” on the most recent revelation that there is a ballot initiative that will require “bond” for anyone arrested.

    This would be a serious infliction on those poorest who would be confined to jail because of their financial condition on the most minor offenses, and, a stress on the “justice” system, as well as a costly burden on scarce public resources.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.