News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Thursday February 9th 2012

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

energy city council xcel transportation municipalization election 2011 climate action renewables open space housing density boulder county jefferson parkway bicycles CU youth BVSD local food urban planning mountain bikes agriculture fires recreation Rocky Flats colorado politics decarbonization smart regs journalism development preservation april fools immigration affordable housing new era colorado GMOs wildlife election 2010 plutonium planning board coal transit village downtown climate change arts gardens education radioactive waste height limits boards and commissions rental farming nutrition parking homeless planning reserve climate smart loan solar panels architecture taxes water supply sprawl PUC fracking david miller climate change deniers wetlands plan boulder daily camera election land use University Hill population growth pedestrian Newlands Whittier campaign finance library diagonal plaza Mapleton west tsa PV arizona mayor comprehensive plan recycling historic district Orchard Grove natural gas suzanne jones lisa morzel pesticide golden hogan-pancost tim plass bsec bob bellemare ken wilson smart grid Leslie Glustrom organic car share heartland institute groundwater john tayer hazardous waste ken regelson water quality transit jane jacobs george karakehian mobile home parks van jones zero waste Neighborhoods districting BVCP ecocycle bike share city budget colorado legislature snow removal silly walks blue friday Washington Native Americans contamination koch brothers camping tea party city attorney move to amend chautauqua constitution corporate personhood shelter suburbs plastic bags daniel ziskin modernism kenney group 2B&2C mountain lions sam weaver dan king jonathan hondorf kevin hotaling mark gelband fenno hoffman water utility Martin Acres chamber historic boulder Old North Boulder bears public spaces green points trash tom tancredo technology zoning trails diversity city manager bruce recession green jobs dead malls energy efficiency peak oil RTD media beetle watch school lunch blue line

Is the Jefferson Parkway a Road to the Past?


By

Smart twenty-first century transportation planning meets the multiple goals of economic, environmental, and social sustainability.  The League of Women Voters of Jefferson County has studied the proposed Jefferson Parkway toll road – with one terminus at the Interlocken Business Park and the other at Colorado 93 north of Golden – and questions whether these goals can be met.

The Jefferson Parkway Public Highway Authority was formed to complete the Denver metro area beltway after the Colorado Department of Transportation was unable to raise funds and come to agreement about the project’s construction.  Although funding for the toll road itself will come from private investors, the Jefferson Parkway proposal could be a big ticket item for future taxpayers.  Estimated costs for area governmental entities and the Colorado Department of Transportation range from $330 million to more than $500 million.  The money will be needed to construct the interchanges to access both the north and south ends of the toll road.   So Coloradans will assume both that tax liability and a toll to traverse a 10-mile stretch of road that parallels existing roads.

The Authority’s plan includes a right-of-way on the Rocky Flats National Wildlife Refuge.  We have requested that the U.S. Department of the Interior require the preparation of a supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to update management strategies for the impacts of that transportation easement that were not known when the original EIS was written for the Refuge.  Additionally, new information is needed for the impacts of new proposals for commercial and residential developments on the east, south and west boundaries of the Refuge.  Without the supplemental EIS, we will not know how the latest development plans would impact wildlife habitat and corridors, scenic vistas, air quality and noise…all important considerations for a viable, sustainable refuge environment.

We are very concerned that the public interest will not be served if a “non-compete” clause were included in a contract with a private developer.  There is precedent for this.  The Northwest Parkway Public Highway Authority’s 99-year lease allows the concessionaire to be compensated if road improvements on the arterials lower toll road use, and thus revenues.  Could a similar clause preclude, for example, the building of a light rail line between Golden and Boulder or Interlocken?

For the League of Women Voters of Jefferson County, public transparency is of the utmost importance so that citizens can judge whether we should be building a parkway that does not complete the metro area beltway, and for which there may be more practical alternatives.

Sixty years ago our nation saw roads as paths to prosperity, and that might have been right for the time.  Today, however, we should not be encouraging more driving, more congestion, more sprawl, and further stresses on ecosystems and human health.  Smart, sustainable transportation planning recognizes the interdependence of economic, ecological and social impacts.  It minimizes economic costs, supports a choice of travel modes, and protects the public’s long-term priorities.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Reader Feedback

2 Responses to “Is the Jefferson Parkway a Road to the Past?”

  1. Dick Sugg says:

    The LWV is right in most everything they say about the Jefferson Parkway, but have not given all the reasons why the JP is a bad idea–touted as improving regional travel (the Denver metro region is seven-plus counties) when it will not; claimed to be necessary for economic
    growth, but will enrich only land owners, developers, builders, and realtors (who support our elected officials); does nothing to improve traffic through Interlocken or through Golden on two-lane CO 93; will do nothing to ease congestion, as claimed, on Wadsworth;
    will not, as claimed, replace CO 93 as the best route between Golden and Boulder; will increase congestion and delay on CO 93 in Golden, on C-470, and on I-70–and much more. The LWV article was wrong about one thing the same way Jeffco Commissioner Kathy Hartman was. The second paragraph implies that the JP will “complete the
    beltway,” which is not true.

  2. Dick Sugg says:

    See the Denver Post on-line for more comments on the LWV article about the Jeffrson Parkway.

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.