News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Friday September 4th 2015

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

transportation energy city council xcel municipalization urban planning april fools housing election 2011 bicycles climate action density boulder county open space agriculture renewables local food CU election 2013 youth jefferson parkway affordable housing climate change Rocky Flats preservation development BVSD pedestrian immigration mountain bikes GMOs decarbonization farming recreation fracking fires colorado politics downtown transit smart regs new era colorado boards and commissions plutonium journalism architecture plan boulder wildlife transit village radioactive waste natural gas commuting parking rental height limits april fools 2015 urban design planning board education energy efficiency homeless gardens coal Neighborhoods arts historic district students ghgs water supply diversity election 2010 taxes bike lane election 2012 solar population growth water quality University Hill North Boulder affairs of the heart groundwater organic land use bus planning reserve RTD library election zoning golden politics longmont obama flood zero waste electric utility hazardous waste Mapleton PV sprawl climate smart loan solar panels colorado legislature nutrition diagonal plaza pesticide food league of women voters community cycles epa electric vehicle walkability hogan-pancost transportation master plan community bus rapid transit county commissioners conservation easement drought historic preservation wetlands Newlands daily camera ecocycle comprehensive plan sam weaver mayor recycling wind power ken wilson campaign finance david miller PUC children climate change deniers mining oil climate boulder junction congestion portland jane jacobs monsanto measure 310 germany placemaking road diet right-sizing modernism sustainability gun control gun safety walmart vmt boulder mlk bears west tsa lisa morzel Whittier arizona green points EV Orchard Grove civil rights john tayer crime tim plass suzanne jones kevin hotaling bob bellemare boulder creek contamination bsec districting technology

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...Loading...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.