News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Saturday January 31st 2015

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

energy city council transportation xcel municipalization election 2011 climate action housing boulder county bicycles density april fools open space urban planning renewables agriculture election 2013 CU jefferson parkway youth local food affordable housing Rocky Flats climate change BVSD preservation development immigration mountain bikes farming GMOs recreation decarbonization fracking fires colorado politics transit smart regs downtown new era colorado journalism plutonium wildlife plan boulder boards and commissions commuting radioactive waste pedestrian natural gas transit village rental architecture planning board height limits homeless energy efficiency education parking gardens coal water supply election 2010 students taxes arts historic district election 2012 water quality ghgs North Boulder University Hill population growth bus solar organic groundwater library RTD land use diversity planning reserve Mapleton solar panels zero waste climate smart loan election Neighborhoods diagonal plaza obama bike lane electric utility urban design nutrition flood affairs of the heart sprawl hazardous waste colorado legislature politics golden pesticide community cycles longmont food sam weaver bus rapid transit epa ken wilson county commissioners drought hogan-pancost conservation easement league of women voters Newlands PV ecocycle comprehensive plan mayor david miller recycling wind power daily camera climate change deniers PUC wetlands campaign finance mining monsanto jane jacobs electric vehicle climate community lisa morzel walmart oil measure 310 suzanne jones sustainability gun safety germany gun control children west tsa Whittier bears arizona green points tim plass zoning Orchard Grove boulder john tayer mlk kevin hotaling boulder creek bob bellemare contamination bsec Washington blue line blue friday bike share silly walks public spaces snow removal copenhagen technology marijuana BVCP districting al bartlett EV historic boulder city budget mobile home parks

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.