News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Friday July 3rd 2015

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

transportation energy city council xcel municipalization april fools election 2011 climate action housing urban planning bicycles density boulder county open space agriculture renewables local food CU election 2013 jefferson parkway youth affordable housing climate change Rocky Flats preservation development BVSD immigration mountain bikes GMOs farming recreation pedestrian decarbonization fracking fires colorado politics downtown transit smart regs new era colorado boards and commissions plutonium journalism architecture plan boulder wildlife transit village radioactive waste commuting natural gas rental height limits planning board april fools 2015 energy efficiency urban design education arts homeless gardens coal parking students water supply election 2010 Neighborhoods taxes historic district election 2012 bike lane ghgs solar population growth water quality University Hill North Boulder organic groundwater bus land use library diversity planning reserve RTD election zero waste climate smart loan golden politics longmont hazardous waste obama PV flood electric utility diagonal plaza Mapleton affairs of the heart solar panels nutrition sprawl colorado legislature pesticide community cycles electric vehicle sam weaver food drought epa ken wilson bus rapid transit county commissioners hogan-pancost conservation easement league of women voters daily camera Newlands ecocycle recycling david miller comprehensive plan mayor wind power wetlands climate change deniers PUC campaign finance children monsanto climate mining boulder junction oil community modernism jane jacobs gun control portland road diet lisa morzel measure 310 sustainability germany gun safety walmart Orchard Grove mlk bears west tsa Whittier arizona zoning green points suzanne jones EV boulder john tayer tim plass crime kevin hotaling contamination bob bellemare boulder creek bsec marijuana public spaces historic boulder blue friday technology city budget districting BVCP al bartlett mobile home parks

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.