News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Tuesday July 26th 2016

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing april fools urban planning bicycles election 2011 climate action density boulder county open space affordable housing agriculture renewables CU local food election 2013 youth jefferson parkway pedestrian development election 2015 climate change Rocky Flats preservation BVSD immigration recreation mountain bikes transit GMOs farming decarbonization fracking urban design fires wildlife boards and commissions colorado politics architecture downtown smart regs new era colorado plutonium journalism homeless transit village plan boulder commuting natural gas radioactive waste parking rental height limits planning board april fools 2015 ghgs energy efficiency Neighborhoods historic district North Boulder students walkability education gardens coal arts election 2010 historic preservation water supply bus taxes land use diversity University Hill election 2012 bike lane groundwater solar zoning water quality population growth RTD library safety affairs of the heart growth election april fools 2016 mayor organic zero waste planning reserve politics electric vehicle longmont hazardous waste electric utility obama right-sizing transportation master plan golden flood hogan-pancost solar panels PV climate smart loan comprehensive plan sprawl recycling nutrition Mapleton colorado legislature diagonal plaza wetlands bears epa conservation easement pesticide food congestion boulder junction street design drought ballot inequality road diet county commissioners bus rapid transit league of women voters automobile children daily camera Newlands community cycles ecocycle campaign finance david miller sam weaver PUC ken wilson community climate change deniers wind power kevin hotaling bob bellemare john tayer tim plass boulder flood plain suzanne jones monsanto bsec women jane jacobs lisa morzel modernism public spaces contamination Orchard Grove EV green points technology BVCP arizona Whittier crime boulder creek mlk civil rights marijuana west tsa

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...Loading...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.