News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Sunday March 29th 2015

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council energy transportation xcel municipalization election 2011 climate action housing urban planning density april fools bicycles boulder county open space agriculture renewables election 2013 CU local food jefferson parkway youth affordable housing preservation Rocky Flats climate change BVSD development immigration mountain bikes GMOs decarbonization farming recreation fracking colorado politics fires transit downtown smart regs new era colorado boards and commissions plutonium journalism wildlife plan boulder transit village natural gas radioactive waste commuting pedestrian architecture rental height limits planning board education gardens energy efficiency homeless coal parking election 2010 students urban design arts water supply historic district taxes election 2012 ghgs water quality North Boulder Neighborhoods University Hill population growth organic solar groundwater bus planning reserve library land use diversity RTD solar panels zero waste climate smart loan election Mapleton hazardous waste obama flood electric utility diagonal plaza bike lane sprawl colorado legislature politics nutrition golden affairs of the heart pesticide community cycles league of women voters food sam weaver bus rapid transit epa ken wilson county commissioners drought hogan-pancost conservation easement longmont Newlands PV ecocycle comprehensive plan mayor david miller recycling daily camera climate change deniers wind power PUC wetlands campaign finance monsanto boulder junction jane jacobs electric vehicle mining lisa morzel community walmart climate measure 310 suzanne jones sustainability gun safety oil germany gun control children west tsa Whittier bears Orchard Grove green points tim plass zoning arizona bob bellemare john tayer mlk kevin hotaling boulder contamination boulder creek bsec blue line blue friday Washington copenhagen silly walks public spaces bike share technology marijuana BVCP districting al bartlett EV historic boulder city budget mobile home parks

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.