News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Saturday April 30th 2016

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing april fools urban planning bicycles election 2011 density climate action boulder county open space agriculture affordable housing renewables CU local food election 2013 youth jefferson parkway pedestrian development election 2015 climate change Rocky Flats preservation BVSD immigration recreation mountain bikes transit GMOs farming decarbonization fracking urban design fires wildlife boards and commissions colorado politics architecture downtown smart regs new era colorado plutonium journalism homeless plan boulder transit village commuting radioactive waste natural gas parking rental height limits planning board april fools 2015 ghgs historic district Neighborhoods energy efficiency students walkability North Boulder gardens education arts coal bus election 2010 water supply historic preservation taxes land use diversity University Hill election 2012 groundwater solar bike lane library water quality zoning population growth RTD safety april fools 2016 mayor affairs of the heart organic zero waste planning reserve politics longmont hogan-pancost obama electric utility flood growth right-sizing transportation master plan golden hazardous waste solar panels PV climate smart loan election sprawl recycling nutrition Mapleton colorado legislature diagonal plaza wetlands bears food epa boulder junction pesticide conservation easement community cycles street design congestion ballot road diet bus rapid transit drought county commissioners electric vehicle automobile campaign finance children Newlands ecocycle league of women voters comprehensive plan daily camera david miller sam weaver PUC ken wilson community climate change deniers wind power tim plass kevin hotaling bob bellemare john tayer suzanne jones boulder mining lisa morzel flood plain bsec monsanto women modernism jane jacobs public spaces contamination Orchard Grove EV green points technology BVCP arizona Whittier crime boulder creek mlk civil rights marijuana west tsa

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...Loading...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.