News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Wednesday October 26th 2016

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county affordable housing open space agriculture renewables CU local food election 2013 youth climate change jefferson parkway pedestrian development election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats BVSD immigration mountain bikes recreation transit GMOs boards and commissions farming decarbonization urban design fracking fires colorado politics wildlife architecture downtown smart regs new era colorado journalism plutonium homeless plan boulder transit village radioactive waste ghgs natural gas commuting parking height limits rental planning board april fools 2015 energy efficiency coal historic district diversity Neighborhoods historic preservation students walkability gardens land use North Boulder arts education solar election 2010 bus taxes University Hill water supply groundwater bike lane election 2012 zoning water quality population growth RTD library safety affairs of the heart electric utility april fools 2016 election growth organic mayor zero waste planning reserve politics longmont hogan-pancost county commissioners right-sizing hazardous waste golden transportation master plan flood obama electric vehicle Mapleton solar panels climate smart loan recycling sprawl PV comprehensive plan bears colorado legislature nutrition diagonal plaza wetlands epa conservation easement pesticide food congestion street design drought ballot boulder junction inequality road diet bus rapid transit renewable energy community automobile children community cycles daily camera ecocycle Newlands campaign finance ken wilson league of women voters PUC sam weaver david miller climate change deniers wind power john tayer boulder contamination bob bellemare bsec women kevin hotaling jane jacobs boulder creek modernism lisa morzel tim plass suzanne jones marijuana crime Orchard Grove EV green points technology BVCP arizona Whittier mlk civil rights west tsa public spaces flood mitigation | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


reprinted courtesy

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? –

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.