News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Sunday May 24th 2015

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council energy transportation xcel municipalization april fools election 2011 climate action housing urban planning density boulder county bicycles open space agriculture renewables election 2013 CU local food jefferson parkway youth affordable housing preservation Rocky Flats climate change BVSD development immigration mountain bikes GMOs decarbonization farming recreation fracking colorado politics fires transit downtown smart regs new era colorado boards and commissions plutonium journalism wildlife plan boulder transit village natural gas radioactive waste commuting pedestrian architecture rental height limits april fools 2015 planning board education homeless energy efficiency parking gardens coal students urban design water supply election 2010 Neighborhoods taxes arts historic district election 2012 water quality ghgs North Boulder University Hill population growth organic solar groundwater bus planning reserve library land use diversity RTD climate smart loan election zero waste solar panels politics hazardous waste obama bike lane Mapleton flood electric utility colorado legislature nutrition longmont diagonal plaza sprawl golden affairs of the heart food pesticide community cycles league of women voters epa drought hogan-pancost ken wilson bus rapid transit county commissioners conservation easement sam weaver Newlands PV ecocycle comprehensive plan mayor david miller recycling wind power daily camera climate change deniers PUC wetlands campaign finance boulder junction monsanto jane jacobs electric vehicle mining community lisa morzel walmart climate measure 310 suzanne jones sustainability gun safety oil germany gun control bears mlk children west tsa Whittier arizona tim plass green points Orchard Grove zoning boulder kevin hotaling crime john tayer bob bellemare contamination boulder creek bsec public spaces blue friday silly walks blue line marijuana Washington EV historic boulder technology districting BVCP al bartlett city budget mobile home parks

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.