News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Sunday August 2nd 2015

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

transportation energy city council xcel municipalization urban planning april fools election 2011 climate action bicycles housing density boulder county open space agriculture renewables local food CU election 2013 jefferson parkway youth affordable housing climate change Rocky Flats preservation development BVSD pedestrian immigration mountain bikes GMOs decarbonization farming recreation fracking fires colorado politics downtown transit smart regs new era colorado boards and commissions plutonium journalism architecture plan boulder wildlife transit village commuting radioactive waste natural gas rental height limits april fools 2015 planning board urban design parking education energy efficiency homeless gardens coal Neighborhoods arts historic district students ghgs election 2010 water supply taxes bike lane solar election 2012 University Hill water quality population growth North Boulder organic groundwater bus diversity library land use planning reserve RTD election zero waste climate smart loan golden politics longmont hazardous waste obama electric utility flood PV diagonal plaza solar panels affairs of the heart Mapleton nutrition colorado legislature sprawl epa food league of women voters pesticide hogan-pancost community cycles county commissioners conservation easement community walkability transportation master plan drought bus rapid transit electric vehicle wetlands Newlands daily camera ecocycle comprehensive plan sam weaver mayor recycling david miller ken wilson campaign finance wind power climate change deniers children PUC portland oil germany climate congestion mining gun control boulder junction monsanto road diet gun safety historic preservation right-sizing jane jacobs placemaking measure 310 walmart vmt sustainability zoning crime bears west tsa modernism Whittier arizona green points EV Orchard Grove mlk kevin hotaling boulder creek suzanne jones lisa morzel tim plass bsec john tayer contamination bob bellemare boulder BVCP districting technology

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.