News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Saturday February 6th 2016

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel urban planning housing bicycles april fools election 2011 density climate action boulder county open space agriculture renewables affordable housing CU local food election 2013 youth jefferson parkway development pedestrian election 2015 climate change preservation Rocky Flats BVSD immigration mountain bikes recreation GMOs decarbonization farming fracking transit fires colorado politics architecture downtown urban design new era colorado smart regs boards and commissions plutonium journalism wildlife plan boulder transit village radioactive waste commuting natural gas parking homeless height limits planning board rental april fools 2015 Neighborhoods education energy efficiency ghgs North Boulder gardens coal arts historic district students walkability water supply election 2010 diversity taxes land use University Hill election 2012 groundwater historic preservation bike lane solar zoning water quality population growth RTD library bus mayor affairs of the heart safety zero waste organic planning reserve politics hogan-pancost longmont obama electric utility flood right-sizing transportation master plan golden hazardous waste solar panels PV recycling sprawl election climate smart loan Mapleton nutrition diagonal plaza colorado legislature wetlands epa pesticide boulder junction community cycles conservation easement road diet congestion growth electric vehicle ballot bus rapid transit drought county commissioners food children campaign finance daily camera ecocycle league of women voters comprehensive plan Newlands sam weaver community PUC ken wilson climate change deniers wind power david miller suzanne jones lisa morzel john tayer tim plass modernism boulder kevin hotaling oil jane jacobs portland germany bob bellemare climate monsanto flood plain mining civil rights bsec arizona Whittier Orchard Grove EV BVCP green points bears marijuana automobile contamination boulder creek crime public spaces west tsa mlk

CSMonitor.com | Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work?


By

reprinted courtesy http://www.intoon.com

It’s a long, laborious, and ultimately costly gesture, economists warn, but more US cities are joining the pile-on of boycotts designed to sock Arizona for its tough new immigration policy.

The Arizona immigration law, requiring police to determine a person’s immigration status if there is a reasonable suspicion about the suspect’s legal status, was signed April 24 to go into effect within 90 days. Arizona lawmakers last week changed the language of the bill to require scrutiny only of people who police already have stopped, detained or arrested for other reasons.

This week, Boston; Oakland, Calif.; West Hollywood, Calif.; New York; and San Diego all passed boycotts or resolutions condemning Arizona with promises of looking into how to cut contracts with the state. San Francisco and St. Paul, Minn. – as well as Denver’s school system – have already banned employee travel to Arizona using public funds.

Within Arizona, both Tucson and Flagstaff city councils voted Tuesday to sue the state, citing concerns about enforcement costs and negative effects on the state’s tourism industry.

Do such moves produce tangible pressure, or are they just symbolic, toothless gestures?  Read more:  Arizona immigration law: Can city boycotts work? – CSMonitor.com.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...Loading...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.