News, Analysis and Opinion for the Informed Boulder Resident
Monday April 22nd 2019

Support the Blue Line

Subscribe to the Blue Line

That's what she said

city council transportation energy municipalization xcel housing urban planning april fools bicycles climate action election 2011 density boulder county open space affordable housing election agriculture renewables CU local food climate change election 2013 development jefferson parkway youth pedestrian election 2015 preservation Rocky Flats election 2017 recreation BVSD immigration mountain bikes boards and commissions decarbonization transit urban design GMOs fracking plan boulder farming fires wildlife colorado politics downtown architecture smart regs new era colorado plutonium natural gas journalism homeless planning board transit village parking commuting ghgs radioactive waste land use taxes rental height limits coal historic preservation april fools 2015 walkability historic district diversity energy efficiency Neighborhoods population growth flood students growth North Boulder gardens arts education election 2010 election 2018 solar bus water supply zoning University Hill nutrition RTD bike lane electric utility library safety sprawl groundwater water quality election 2012 affairs of the heart april fools 2016 renewable energy organic flood plain planning reserve mayor zero waste blue line wetlands county commissioners hogan-pancost politics electric vehicle hazardous waste transportation master plan obama longmont ballot right-sizing street design colorado legislature solar panels PV recycling golden comprehensive plan climate smart loan diagonal plaza Mapleton campaign finance bears flood mitigation conservation easement epa food boulder junction congestion pesticide road diet drought election 2016 planning inequality bus rapid transit flooding oil daily camera climate change deniers automobile PUC children ecocycle community cycles BVCP Newlands community league of women voters wind power public health ken wilson david miller sam weaver mlk crime civil rights boulder creek west tsa contamination city attorney al bartlett public spaces green points technology EV Orchard Grove marijuana Whittier arizona

US 36 Phase One Improvements


By

photo courtesy wikimedia.org

City of Boulder Guidelines for the Implementation of US 36 Phase One Improvements was the topic of discussion at the April 6, 2010 City Council meeting.

A Record of Decision (ROD) was signed in December 2009 for the first phase of improvements to US 36 between Denver and Boulder. The ROD on the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) identifies a “preferred alternative” set of improvements. As stated in the Executive Summary for this agenda item, “Phase One of the preferred alternative improvements is a strong multimodal package that includes a managed lane [for use by Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), high-occupancy vehicles and toll-paying vehicles], key interchange improvements and a bikeway between Boulder and Denver.” And, it also states, “The planned multimodal expansion of US 36 will be one of the single largest capital improvement projects to take place near the city in recent years.”

Director of Public Works Tracy Winfree presented the draft guidelines explaining that they were in response to a request by Council at the January 2010 study session on regional transportation. This document lays out policy guidelines to inform and guide involvement in the implementation of improvements to the US 36 corridor between Boulder and Denver. Funding for the project is now top priority, while various design and impact issues also need on-going attention. Guiding principles will be the environment and resolving issues that were not resolved satisfactorily in past. Of particular concern will be the monitoring of progress and advocating for wetland mitigation and wildlife protection under both Federal and local regulations.

City Council voted unanimously (Council Member Cowles was absent) to approve the motion made by Council Member Gray and seconded by Council Member Morzel to approve the City of Boulder Guidelines for the Implementation of US 36 Phase One Improvements as amended by Council on April 6, 2010, but with direction to strengthen the wording in the guidelines.

Some Council Members expressed concern that the wording in the guidelines was “wimpy.”  Their reasoning was that, because the guidelines are a public document, they need to be clearer about how serious the city is about critical issues.  With stronger language in the guidelines, Boulder’s resolve would be apparent to other negotiating parties and Boulder’s representatives in negotiations would have less wiggle room.  The staff memo and draft guidelines are available on the city’s website.

Rate this article: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

What do you think? Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.